Jump to content

Daidaitawa Mai zurfi

Daga Wikipedia, Insakulofidiya ta kyauta.
Daidaitawa Mai zurfi
Asali
MawallafiJem Bendell (en) Fassara
Lokacin bugawa2018
Characteristics

Deep Adaptation wani ra'ayi ne, ajanda, da kuma yunkurin zamantakewar kasa da kasa. Ya ɗauka cewa abubuwan da suka faru na matsanancin yanayi da sauran tasirin Canjin yanayi za su kara lalata abinci, ruwa, mafaka, wutar lantarki, da tsarin zamantakewa da gwamnati. Wadannan rushewa zasu iya haifar da rushewar al'umma a cikin 'yan shekarun da suka gabata. Kalmar "zurfi" tana nuna cewa ana buƙatar matakai masu ƙarfi don daidaitawa da yanayin rayuwar masana'antu, biyo bayan amfani da suka gabata kamar zurfin muhalli. Aenda ta haɗa da dabi'u na rashin tashin hankali, tausayi, son sani da girmamawa, tare da tsarin aiki mai ginawa.

An gabatar da manufar Deep Adaptation a cikin takarda ta 2018 "Deep Adaptation: A Map for Navigating Climate Tragedy" ta Jami'ar Cumbria mai kula da jagoranci Jem Bendell. An gabatar da takarda ga Cibiyar Nazarin Kasuwanci, Gudanarwa da Manufofin, amma masu bita sun nemi manyan sake dubawa. Bendell ya zaɓi ya buga kansa ta hanyar Cibiyar Jagora da Ci gaba a Jami'ar Cumbria . [1] A cikin takarda, Bendell ya bayyana cewa rushewar zamantakewar jama'a ta kusa saboda rushewar yanayi ba za a iya gujewa ba. Tun daga wannan lokacin ya ba da wannan a matsayin ra'ayi, maimakon gaskiya, a cikin takarda ta biyu a cikin 2020 .[2] An yi jawabi ga takarda ta asali ga kamfanoni da al'ummar ci gaba da ilimi amma sun sami babban masu karatu, ana sauke su fiye da sau 600,000 har zuwa Nuwamba 2019. [3] An fassara takarda cikin harsuna da yawa.

Abun ciki na takarda na asali

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]
Jem Bendell, 2019

A cikin takarda ta 2018, Bendell ya tabbatar da cewa "kusan rushewar zamantakewa" (wanda daga baya ya kira rushewar al'umma [4]) saboda canjin yanayi ba za a iya gujewa ba. Ya kalubalanci aikin kasuwanci kamar yadda ya saba a cikin gwamnati, masana'antu, da ilimi, yana sanar da "ƙarshen ra'ayin cewa za mu iya warwarewa ko jimrewa da canjin yanayi". Ya sake nazarin binciken kimiyya game da canjin sauyin yanayi, yana mai cewa ya jaddada sakamakon da ba a buga ba kwanan nan da abubuwan da suka yi kamar maki masu tasowa. [5][6] A ra'ayinsa, waɗannan sun fassara tsinkayen da aka buga game da lalacewar yanayi da suka fi dacewa.  

Bendell ya ba da shawarar nau'ikan musantawa waɗanda ke hana mutane fuskantar yiwuwar rushewa. Ya ba da kwarewarsa na zuwa ga fahimtar juna da kuma rayuwa tare da ra'ayin rushewa a rayuwarsa. Sautin takarda na sirri ne, kuma an bayyana shi a matsayin autoethnographic. Tare da mummunan ban dariya, ya lura cewa kammalawa ya sa fannin ilimi na ƙwarewa, dorewa, ba zai yiwu ba. A ƙarshe, ya kalubalanci malamai da masu tsara manufofi su sauya zuwa 'Deep Adaptation Agenda' na martani ga canjin yanayi. Ya ba da tsari don wannan ajanda, wanda ke da matakai uku: juriya, "me su ne ƙa'idodi masu daraja da halaye waɗanda al'ummomin ɗan adam za su so su kiyaye yayin da suke neman tsira?"; watsi, "bar wasu kadarori, halaye da imani, inda riƙe su zai iya sa abubuwa su fi muni"; da kuma maidowa, "sake gano halaye da hanyoyin rayuwa da ƙungiya da wayewarmu ta hydrocarbon-fuel ta lalace". [1]

Karɓar da amsoshi

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Masana kimiyya da yawa sun lura cewa ƙaddamarwar Bendell game da rashin tabbas na rushewar zamantakewa ta kusa saboda rushewar yanayi ba a tabbatar da ita ba ko kuma an yarda da ita ba. Masanin ilimin yanayi Michael Mann yana da mummunan ra'ayi a cikin bincikensa game da ƙaddamarwar kimiyya ta Bendell, kuma Gavin Schmidt, shugaban Cibiyar Nazarin Space ta NASA, ya tabbatar da cewa yanayin yanayi na baya na canjin sannu a hankali zai ci gaba.[3] Masana kimiyya da marubutan muhalli sun bambanta a kan kimantawarsu game da yiwuwar rushewa. Misali, jagoran marubucin kimantawar hadarin bala'i na duniya na Majalisar Dinkin Duniya na 2019, Scott Williams, ya ce Bendell ya fi kusa da alamar fiye da masu adawa da shi, kamar yadda rahoton Majalisar Dinkinobho ya kasance "kusa da bayyana cewa 'rugujewa ba za a iya gujewa ba". [3] Da yake amsawa ga Nicholas, masanin ilimin halitta Pablo Servigne da abokan aiki sun sami aikin Deep Adaptation ya zama abin dogaro, kuma zargewa sau da yawa yaudara.[7] Sun lura cewa waɗannan zarge-zarge ba su soke babban saƙon cewa rushewa yana da damar da za ta iya buƙatar saurin daidaitawa mai zurfi ba.

Bendell ya buga martani ga masu sukar takarda ta 2018 a tsakiyar 2020. Bendell ya kuma bayar da fasalin da aka sake fasalin takarda ta asali a cikin 2020.[2] Takardar ta asali ta bayyana cewa "rugujewar zamantakewa ba za a iya gujewa ba. " An sake fasalin "an ƙaddamar da ra'ayi cewa rugujewar al'umma mai yiwuwa ne, ba za a gujewa, ko kuma ya riga ya bayyana. " Tun lokacin da aka buga takardar, matakan kimiyya da yawa na saurin canjin yanayi sun wuce tsinkaya.

Takardar ta kuma fuskanci zargi na ɗabi'a. Wadannan zarge-zarge sun fara ne daga zaton cewa bayyana mummunan ra'ayi game da canjin yanayi yana haifar da fidda rai da rashin aiki. Masu bincike Nicholas, Hall da Schmidt sun tabbatar da cewa da'awar Bendell na rushewar al'umma saboda canjin yanayi ba kawai ba daidai ba ne, amma zai lalata dalilin motsi na yanayi. Michael Mann, da kuma ɗan jaridar kimiyya Ronald Bailey a cikin Reason sun nuna irin wannan damuwa.

Mai fafutukar muhalli kuma farfesa Rupert Read ya yi maraba da binciken Bendell, yana ba da shawarar cewa kodayake ana iya yin muhawara game da yiwuwar rushewar al'umma, yiwuwar sa tana nufin cewa dole ne mu shiga cikin manufar Deep Adaptation saboda Ka'idar kariya. Naresh Giangrande, wanda ya kafa garin Transition na farko, ya kira takarda wani muhimmin bangare na karuwar ilimi mai inganci game da ainihin haɗarin rushewar al'umma daga tasirin rushewar yanayi. Mai horar da adalci na zamantakewa Brooke Lavelle da mai binciken dorewa Zach Walsh sun tambayi, "Mene ne idan kokarinmu na ƙirƙirar duniya mai adalci da kulawa ba a raba su da kokarinmu na daidaitawa da rushewar zamantakewa na kusa ba?"

  1. 1 2 Bendell, Jem (July 27, 2018). "Deep adaptation: a map for navigating climate tragedy": 1–31. Archived from the original on 8 May 2020. Retrieved October 8, 2021. Cite journal requires |journal= (help) Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name ":1" defined multiple times with different content.
  2. 1 2 Bendell, Jem (2021) "Deep Adaptation: a Map for Navigating Climate Tragedy" In Bendell, Jem; Read, Rupert (eds.). Deep Adaptation. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. pp. 211-223. ISBN 978-1-5095-4683-1. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name ":2" defined multiple times with different content.
  3. 1 2 3 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named ":0".
  4. Bendell, Jem (2021) "Deep Adaptation: a Map for Navigating Climate Tragedy" In Bendell, Jem; Read, Rupert (eds.). Deep Adaptation. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. pp. 211-223. ISBN 978-1-5095-4683-1.
  5. Bendell, Jem (July 27, 2018). "Deep adaptation: a map for navigating climate tragedy": 1–31. Archived from the original on 8 May 2020. Retrieved October 8, 2021. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  6. Lenton, Timothy M.; Rockström, Johan; Gaffney, Owen; Rahmstorf, Stefan; Richardson, Katherine; Steffen, Will; Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim (27 November 2019). "Climate tipping points — too risky to bet against". Nature. 575 (7784): 592–595. Bibcode:2019Natur.575..592L. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-03595-0. PMID 31776487. S2CID 208330359. |hdl-access= requires |hdl= (help)
  7. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named ":5".