Damar Samun Adalci

Daga Wikipedia, Insakulofidiya ta kyauta.
Damar Samun Adalci
academic discipline (en) Fassara
Bayanai
Ƙaramin ɓangare na harkar zamantakewa
Facet of (en) Fassara legal system (en) Fassara

Samun adalci wata ƙa'ida ce ta asali a cikin doka wacce ke bayyana yadda 'yan ƙasa ke samun daidaitaccen damar yin amfani da tsarin doka a cikin mahallinsu.[1]

Yawancin mahallin suna da yunƙuri da shirye-shirye an tsara su don samar da sabis na doka ga al'ummomin da ƙila in ba haka ba suna da wahalar samun shawarar doka da wakilci. Idan ba tare da samun adalci ba, mutane ba za su iya yin cikakken amfani da haƙƙinsu ba, ƙalubalantar wariya, ko ɗaukar masu yanke shawara kan ayyukansu.[2]

Yadda al'ummomi ke taimakawa ƴan kasarsu wajen samun adalci ya sha banban da kasa. Ana iya ƙara samun damar yin adalci ta hanyar samun kuɗi da kyau da ƙungiyoyin taimakon doka waɗanda ke ba da sabis na shari'a kyauta ga matalauta,[3] da kuma ta hanyar shirye-shiryen pro bono ta hanyar da lauyoyin sa kai ke ba da sabis da wakilci a cikin kotu,[4] ko ta wasu shirye-shiryen da aka tsara. don taimaka wa mutane su sami magunguna ta hanyar kotu ko wasu cibiyoyin shari'a.[5]

Shirye-shiryen ƙasa da kasa[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Samun Kyautar Harkar Shari'a[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

  An kafa ƙungiyar Free Access to Law Movement (FALM) a cikin 1992, tare da burin samar da damar yanar gizo kyauta ga ainihin bayanan doka da albarkatu. A cikin 2002, FALM ta karɓi Sanarwa kan Samun Doka Kyauta. Manufar motsi shine tabbatar da cewa bayanan doka suna samuwa ga kowa da kowa. Sanarwar ta ayyana bayanan shari'a na jama'a a matsayin gadon gama gari na ɗan adam.

Ƙungiyoyin memba na FALM, da farko ta hanyar Intanet, sun tsunduma cikin yada bayanan shari'a na farko da na sakandare. Misalai na farko sun haɗa da Cibiyar Ba da Bayanin Shari'a a Makarantar Shari'a ta Cornell da Cibiyar Ba da Bayanin Shari'a ta Australasia, aikin haɗin gwiwa na Jami'ar Fasaha ta Sydney da Jami'ar New South Wales. Ƙarshen ya haɗa da farkon fara amfani da fasahar rubutu don wakiltar dokoki azaman hanyar sadarwar nodes, kowanne yana wakiltar sashe. [6][7]

A cikin 2013, Makarantar Shari'a ta Cornell ta kafa Journal of Open Access to Law, don inganta bincike na ƙasa da ƙasa kan batun buɗe damar yin amfani da doka.[8]

Ƙaddamarwa ta ƙasa[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Myanmar[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

MyJustice wata ƙungiyar Tarayyar Turai ce da Tarayyar Turai ke ba da tallafin samun damar samun Adalci da nufin wadata al'ummar Myanmar da ilimi, kwarin gwiwa da damar magance rikice-rikice cikin adalci, adalci da adalci.[9] Tun daga shekara ta 2015 sun kafa "cibiyoyin shari'a" da dama a fadin Myanmar don inganta damar yin adalci ta hanyar ba da shawarwarin shari'a kyauta ga masu ƙaramin ƙarfi da masu zaman kansu, da kuma shiga cikin ayyukan da suka shafi gabatar da taimakon shari'a da horar da doka.[10]

Pakistan[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Samun damar Adalci Initiatives (AJI) wani gungu ne na ayyukan da Sarhad Rural Support Programme (SRSP) ke aiwatarwa a Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, da nufin haɓaka wayar da kan doka da ƙarfafa ƴan ƙasa a matakin tushe ta hanyar ba su damar yin amfani da su don gudanar da ayyukan. hakkokinsu da kuma neman maganin matsalolinsu na shari'a.[11][12][13]

Ƙaddamarwa[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Samun damar Ƙaddamar da Adalci ya ƙunshi ayyuka masu zuwa:[14]

  1. Ƙarfafa Doka
  2. Aitebaar Madadin Rikicin Rigima
  3. Aitebaar Fadakarwa
  4. Ƙarfafa Doka a Malakand
  5. Maganganun Rikici Tsakanin Al'umma

Siffofin[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Alamar gamayya ta ayyukan ita ce, dukkansu suna da manufar ƙarfafa ƙwarin gwiwar al'ummomin da ba su da galihu don kare haƙƙinsu da shiga da kuma ɗaukar nauyin hukumomin gwamnati.[15] A cikin al'ummomi masu matsayi na gargajiya, ƙungiyoyin jama'a suna fuskantar ƙalubale wajen haɓaka damar yin amfani da sabis ga ƙungiyoyi masu zaman kansu da masu rauni.[16][17]

Ayyukan na neman magance batutuwan da ke da rauni a tsakanin hanyoyin adalci da kuma rashin ingantaccen goyon bayan doka.[18][19] [20]


Wasu daga cikin ayyukan sun fi mayar da hankali ne kan cibiyoyin shari'a na yau da kullun ta yadda za a iya amfani da wasu hanyoyin warware takaddama don warware takaddama a matakin al'umma, tare da taimakawa wajen samar da dandalin tattaunawa tsakanin hanyoyin yau da kullun da na yau da kullun. An horar da mambobin al’ummomin a matsayin ƴan sanda don cike gibin da ke tsakanin masu rauni a cikin al’umma da cibiyoyin gwamnati. A yankuna masu nisa da kuma baya na Pakistan jama'a gaba daya ba sa son amincewa da 'yan sanda ko lauyoyi amma suna nuna babban sha'awar amincewa da manyan al'ummominsu, wadanda sukan warware taƙaddama ta hanyar tsarin Jirga.[21] Ana sanar da 'yan sanda da masu shiga tsakani game da haƙƙin ɗan adam, tsarin shari'a da iyakokin ikonsu wajen magance rikice-rikice masu rikitarwa.[22] Wannan yana tabbatar da cewa ba a rasa haƙƙin mahalarta ba.[23] Ana bukatar Majalisar sasanta rikicin (DRC) da aka kafa ta wannan fanni da su yi aiki tare da ‘yan sandan yankin don tabbatar da gaskiya da inganci.[24][25] An horar da mata da yawa a matsayin masu shiga tsakani da kuma ’yan sanda don ganin shirin ya kasance mai karbuwa ga mata.[26][27][28]

Ana ba da taimakon shari'a ga mutanen da ba za a iya magance matsalolinsu ta hanyar shawarwari, sulhu, sulhu ko wata hanyar da ba ta dace ba.[29][30] Sau da yawa, shari'ar da ta cancanci taimakon shari'a ta ƙunshi batutuwan auren yara, auren dole, zaluncin aure, riƙon yara, hana gado, wariya da dai sauransu.[31][32]

Amurka[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Domin tsarin gargajiya na sabis na isarwa ya buƙaci duk aikin doka da a yi ta hanyar da ba ta dace ba wadatar ayyukan doka gabaɗaya ba ta da ƙarfi.[33] Iyalan da ba su cancanci taimakon shari'a ba amma ba za su iya samun sauƙin biyan sabis na shari'a ba suna cikin rashin kulawa sosai ta tsarin gargajiya. Wani rahoto da Kwamitin Tsare-tsare na Ƙungiyar Lauyoyin Amurka ya yi game da Ba da Sabis na Shari'a ya gano cewa "a cikin gidaje masu matsakaicin matsakaici, kashi 39% sun yi amfani da tsarin shari'a don ƙoƙarin warware matsalolinsu na shari'a, 23% sun yi ƙoƙarin warwarewa ba tare da taimakon shari'a ba, kuma 26% sun dauka. babu wani aiki."

Hanyoyin fasaha[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Lauyoyi, masu zane-zane, da masana kimiyyar kwamfuta sun yi la'akari da hanyoyin da za a yi amfani da fasaha don inganta damar da ba lauyoyi ba don samun adalci. [34]

Cibiyar Fasaha ta Illinois (IIT's) Cibiyar Zane-zane da Kwalejin Shari'a ta Chicago-Kent sun haɗu a kan sake fasalin shekaru da yawa na ƙwarewar kotuna masu wakiltar kansu. Rahoton su na 2002 ya rubuta bincikensu na tsarin taimako na yanzu, ƙirƙirar sabuwar ƙa'idar ƙira, da shirin sabon ƙirar tsarin.[35] Rahoton ya kuma gabatar da wasu tsare-tsare na ra'ayi, yana sake yin tunanin yadda tsarin kotun zai yi aiki kuma mutane za su iya shiga. Wasu daga cikin shawarwarinsu sun haɗa da:

  • "CourtNet", cibiyar sadarwa a cikin ginin kotun, don haɗa haɗin gwiwar ma'aikatan shari'a da jama'a;
  • "Interactive Translator", kayan aikin software wanda za'a iya amfani da shi wajen yin hira da musanyar kotu, mai iya fassara hanyoyin sadarwa na magana da rubutu zuwa harsuna daban-daban;
  • "Archetypes", wani dandalin bincike wanda ke ƙera matsalolin shari'a na masu amfani, yana rarraba su, kuma yana ba da sabis na neman aiki;
  • "Pursuit Evaluator", kayan aiki na kan layi don ba da damar masu yuwuwar masu kara su tantance ko bin shari'ar zai cancanci lokacinsu, kuɗi, da ƙoƙarinsu.
  • "Formulator Formulator", na'ura mai ba da hanya tsakanin hanyoyin sadarwa don barin masu shigar da kara su cire bayanai daga halin da suke ciki da kuma tattara su cikin takardun shari'a daban-daban;
  • "Mai ba da labari", software da ke amfani da samfurin shari'o'in don taimakawa masu ƙararrakin su tsara nasu fom kuma suna koya musu yadda ake rubutawa daidai; kuma
  • "Case Tracker", ma'auni mai ma'amala da bincike na tarihin shari'a, wanda ke ba da fayyace tsarin lokaci da kuma nuni ga ayyukan da suka gabata.[36]

Cibiyar Berkman a Harvard Law School tana aiki tare da alkali Dina Fein a Massachusetts don tsara hanyar samun damar yin adalci a cikin jihar don masu gabatar da kara, masu ƙaramin ƙarfi, masu kara da ba su iya Turanci, da masu naƙasa.[37]

Codex, Cibiyar Stanford don Asusun Lafiya na Lafiya, da dokar bakuncin dokokin shari'a don samun damar masu bincike, 'yan kasuwa,' yan kasuwa da fasaha-da fasaha -gefe don ciyar da iyakokin fasahar doka.

Manazarta[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

  1. Rashid, Norul Mohamed. "Access to Justice". United Nations and the Rule of Law (in Turanci). Retrieved 2022-03-21.
  2. "Access to Justice". United Nations and the Rule of Law. United Nations. Retrieved 12 May 2019.
  3. "Resource Center for Access to Justice Initiatives". American Bar Association. Retrieved 12 May 2019.
  4. "Pro Bono and Volunteer Programs". Center on Court Access to Justice for All. National Center for State Courts. Archived from the original on 12 May 2019. Retrieved 12 May 2019.
  5. "Necessary Condition: Access to Justice". United States: Institute of Peace. Retrieved 12 May 2019.
  6. Legal_Information_Institutes.htm
  7. "AustLII - Publications: AustLII - Libs Paper". austlii.edu.au. Retrieved 26 December 2016.
  8. "Journal of Open Access to Law". cornell.edu. Retrieved 26 December 2016.
  9. "About | MyJustice Myanmar". myjusticemyanmar.org. Archived from the original on 2021-11-29. Retrieved 2020-04-17.
  10. "Union Legal Aid Board to provide help for poor people in pilot project". The Myanmar Times. 2018-05-07. Archived from the original on 2021-11-29. Retrieved 2020-04-17.
  11. Kundi, Asma (26 July 2016). "Call to enhance role of paralegals for protection of human rights". DAWN. Archived from the original on 30 October 2016. Retrieved 16 April 2022.
  12. "Global Legal Empowerment Initiative" (PDF). Open Society Justice Initiative. 2014.
  13. "Training in basic laws & alternative dispute resolution concludes". The News International. 27 December 2016.
  14. "Access to Justice Initiatives". Sarhad Rural Support Programme. 2016. Archived from the original on 2017-08-19. Retrieved 2022-04-16.
  15. Sarhad Rural Support Programme Annual Review 2014-2015. Islamabad: M.R Printers, Islamabad. 2015. p. 16.
  16. "Legal Empowerment: A platform for resilence, innovation and growth" (PDF). WANA Institute. 12 June 2014.
  17. Teale, Lotta (2016-12-01). "How to pay for legal empowerment: alternative structures and sources". Open Democracy. Archived from the original on 2017-12-24. Retrieved 2022-04-16.
  18. "Conference: Practical steps to protect legal rights of rural communities". The Express Tribune (in Turanci). 2013-04-30.
  19. "Initiative to strengthen alternative dispute resolution system". DAWN. 25 September 2014.
  20. "Marc-André Franche, Country Director, UNDP in Pakistan visited Swat". Relief Web (in Turanci). 2013-07-08.
  21. Kundi, Asma (2016-07-26). "Call to enhance role of paralegals for protection of human rights". DAWN.
  22. "SRL arranges workshop for capacity building of DRCs representatives". Daily Times. 24 December 2016.
  23. "DRCs' members briefed about legal system". DAWN. 2016-12-23.
  24. "Dir nazim assures DRCs of his support". DAWN. 2016-12-24.
  25. "Role of DRCs highlighted". The Nation (in Turanci). 28 December 2016.
  26. "Training for DRC members concludes". DAWN. 27 December 2016.
  27. "Work of Shangla DRCs reviewed". DAWN. 1 January 2016.
  28. "Role of DRCs in people's access to justice highlighted". DAWN. 30 December 2016.
  29. "Step aside men: Women mediators trained in alternative dispute resolution". The Express Tribune (in Turanci). 2014-10-04.
  30. "Dispute Resolution Council training workshop ends". Pakistan Observer (in Turanci). 31 December 2016. Archived from the original on 2 January 2017.
  31. "Starting a New Story: How Access to Justice Is Untangling Women's Lives in Northern Pakistan". Open Society Foundations. 28 May 2014.
  32. "Linking Justice to Development in Northern Pakistan". Open Society Foundations. 9 June 2014.
  33. "Standing Committee on the Delivery of Legal Services - Standing Committee / Delivery of Legal Services". abanet.org. Archived from the original on 14 February 2009. Retrieved 26 December 2016.
  34. See CodeX Techindex. Stanford Law School, n.d. Web. 16 June 2017. <https://techindex.law.stanford.edu/ Archived 2022-03-31 at the Wayback Machine>.
  35. "Charles L. Owen, Edward B. Pedwell, and Ronald W. Staudt, "Access to Justice: Meeting the Needs of Self-Represented Litigants", 2002" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2019-05-12.
  36. "Technology and Access to Justice - Berkman Klein Center". harvard.edu. Archived from the original on 5 February 2014. Retrieved 26 December 2016.
  37. School, Stanford Law. "CodeX | Stanford Law School". Stanford Law School. Retrieved May 31, 2016.