Jump to content

Dokar CAN-SPAM ta 2003

Daga Wikipedia, Insakulofidiya ta kyauta.

 

Dokar CAN-SPAM ta 2003
Dokar Majalisa
Bayanai
Ƙasa Tarayyar Amurka
Kwanan wata 2003
Legislated by (en) Fassara 108th United States Congress (en) Fassara

Dokar Kula da Harin Batsa da Talla (CAN-SPAM) ta 2003 doka ce da aka zartar a shekara ta 2003 wacce ta kafa ka'idojin farko na Amurka don aika imel ɗin kasuwanci. Dokar ta buƙaci Hukumar Ciniki ta Tarayya (FTC) don aiwatar da tanadinta. An gabatar da shi ta hanyar Jamhuriyar Republican Conrad Burns, dokar ta wuce duka Majalisar da Majalisar Dattijai a lokacin Majalisa ta 108 ta Amurka kuma Shugaba George W. Bush ya sanya hannu a cikin doka a watan Disamba na shekara ta 2003 kuma an kafa ta a ranar 1 ga Janairu, shekara ta 2004. [1][2]

Tarihi

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Sunan CAN-SPAM ya samo asali ne daga cikakken sunan lissafin: Gudanar da Harin Batsa da Tallace-tallace na Dokar Tallace na 2003. Sanatoci Conrad Burns da Ron Wyden ne suka dauki nauyin lissafin a Majalisa.

Dokar CAN-SPAM a wasu lokuta masu sukar suna kiranta da Dokar "You-Can-Spam" saboda lissafin ya kasa hana nau'ikan imel da yawa kuma ya fice wasu dokokin jihohi waɗanda in ba haka ba za su ba wadanda abin ya shafa hanyoyin da za su iya magance su. Musamman, ba ya buƙatar masu aika imel don samun izini kafin su aika saƙonnin talla. Har ila yau, yana hana jihohi aiwatar da kariya mai karfi na spam, kuma yana hana mutanen da ke karɓar spam daga gurfanar da masu aika spam sai dai a ƙarƙashin dokokin da ba takamaiman imel ba. Dokar ba a tilasta ta ba, duk da wasika ga FTC daga Sanata Burns, wanda ya lura cewa "Tattalin aiki shine mabuɗin game da dokar CAN-SPAM". A cikin 2004, ƙasa da 1% na spam sun bi Dokar CAN-SP AM ta 2003.[3][4]

Dokar ta ba da umarnin FTC ta ba da rahoto ga Majalisa a cikin watanni 24 na tasirin aikin.[5] Da zarar wannan ya faru, ba a ba da shawarar canje-canje ba. Har ila yau, yana buƙatar FTC ta gabatar da dokoki don kare masu amfani daga spam na wayar hannu da ba a so. A ranar 20 ga watan Disamba, shekara ta 2005 FTC ta ba da rahoton cewa yawan spam ya fara daidaitawa, kuma saboda ingantaccen fasahar rigakafin spam, ƙasa tana kaiwa akwatunan masu amfani. An kuma bayar da rahoton raguwar imel ɗin da ke bayyane game da jima'i.[6]

Daga baya gyare-gyare sun canza asalin Dokar CAN-SPAM ta 2003 ta hanyar (1) Ƙara ma'anar kalmar "mutum"; (2) Gyara kalmar "mai aikawa"; (3) Bayyana cewa mai aikawa na iya bin aikin ta hanyar haɗa akwatin gidan waya ko akwatin wasiku mai zaman kansa; da (4) Bayyana cewa don gabatar da buƙatun fita mai inganci, ba za a iya buƙatar mai karɓa don biyan kuɗi ba, samar da bayanan da adireshinsa da zaɓin-fita, ko ɗaukar wasu matakai ban da saƙon amsawa ba ko ziyartar shafi ɗaya a shafin yanar gizo.

Injiniyoyin CAN-SPAM

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Amfani da shi

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

CAN-SPAM, amsa kai tsaye game da karuwar yawan korafe-korafe game da imel ɗin spam, [7] ya bayyana " saƙon imel ɗin lantarki na kasuwanci" a matsayin "duk wani saƙon imel na lantarki ainihin manufarsa shine tallan kasuwanci ko inganta samfurin kasuwanci ko sabis (ciki har da abun ciki a shafin yanar gizon Intanet da ke aiki don manufar kasuwanci). "Ya keɓe "ma'amala ko saƙonni. " Dokokin ƙarshe na FTC (16 CFR 316) yana bayyana kalmar "ma'anar farko" a ranar 16 ga Disamba, 2004.[8] Dokokin jihohin da suka gabata sun yi amfani da yawa (ƙofar lamba), abun ciki (kasuwanci), ko kuma ba a nema su ba don bayyana spam. Ƙuntataccen doka ga imel ɗin kasuwanci waɗanda ke cikin masana'antar suna la'akari da shi sosai don cire imel ɗin siyasa da na addini daga takamaiman bukatun sa.[9][10] Irin waɗannan sakonnin da ba na kasuwanci ba suna da kariya ta Kwaskwarimar Farko, kamar yadda aka nuna a cikin Jaynes v. Commonwealth.[11]

Dokar farar hula

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

A watan Yulin shekara ta 2005, Hukumar Ciniki ta Tarayya ta gabatar da korafin CAN-SPAM na farar hula a kan kamfanoni tara da ke zargin cewa suna da alhakin imel ɗin spam da suka aiko ko kuma masu alaƙa da su.[12] Takwas daga cikin kamfanoni tara, Cyberheat na Tucson, Arizona, APC Entertainment, Inc., na Davie, Florida, MD Media, Inc., [13] na Bingham Farms, Michigan, Pure Marketing Solutions, LLC, [14] na Tampa, Florida, TJ Web Productions, LLC, [15] na Tampa. Florida, da BangBros.com, Inc., [4] na RK Netmedia, Inc., da OX Ideas, Inc., [5] na Miami, Florida sun shiga cikin dokokin amincewa.[16][17][18] Impulse Media Group, Inc.[19] na Seattle, Washington, wanda CarpeLaw PLLC ke wakilta, ya kare karar da aka kawo a kansa.[20].

Manazarta

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]
  1. ↑ Burns, Conrad R. (2003-12-16). "S.877 - 108th Congress (2003-2004): CAN-SPAM Act of 2003". www.congress.gov. Retrieved 2021-06-26.
  2. ↑ Kigerl, Alex C. (2018-03-01). "Email spam origins: does the CAN SPAM act shift spam beyond United States jurisdiction?". Trends in Organized Crime (in Turanci). 21 (1): 62–78. doi:10.1007/s12117-016-9289-9. ISSN 1936-4830.
  3. ↑ "United States: A New Weapon in The Fight Against Spam". mondaq. Retrieved March 21, 2009.
  4. ↑ "Is the CAN-SPAM Law Working?". PC World. Archived from the original on May 18, 2015. Retrieved May 12, 2015.
  5. ↑ "SPAM reports page". FTC. Archived from the original on December 17, 2008. Retrieved March 21, 2009.
  6. ↑ "Effectiveness and Enforcement of the CAN-SPAM Act: A Report to Congress" (PDF). FTC. Archived from the original on 8 October 2013. Retrieved 8 October 2015.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
  7. ↑ "How To Do Email Marketing Right". Aplegal.com. 21 July 2014. Archived from the original on 19 August 2014. Retrieved 15 August 2014.
  8. ↑ "Definitions and Implementation Under the CAN-SPAM Act" (PDF). FTC. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 7, 2009. Retrieved March 21, 2009.
  9. ↑ Roth, Wendy. "The Letter of the CAN-SPAM Law". iMedia Connection. Archived from the original on 29 July 2015. Retrieved 8 October 2015.
  10. ↑ Atkins, Laura (21 May 2008). "Political Spam". Word to the Wise. Retrieved 8 October 2015.
  11. ↑ Helman, Igor. "SPAM-A-LOT: THE STATES' CRUSADE AGAINST UNSOLICITED E-MAIL IN LIGHT OF THE CAN-SPAM ACT AND THE OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE" (PDF). Boston College Law Review. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 8 October 2015.
  12. ↑ "FTC Cracks Down on Illegal X-rated Spam". Ftc.gov. 20 July 2005. Retrieved 7 January 2015.
  13. ↑ "Cyberheat, Inc., et al., US vs". Ftc.gov. 20 July 2005. Retrieved 7 January 2015.
  14. ↑ "APC Entertainment, Inc., et al., US". Ftc.gov. 20 July 2005. Retrieved 7 January 2015.
  15. ↑ "MD Media, Inc., et al., US vs". Ftc.gov. 20 July 2005. Retrieved 7 January 2015.
  16. ↑ "Pure Marketing Solutions, LLC, et al., US vs". Ftc.gov. 20 July 2005. Retrieved 7 January 2015.
  17. ↑ "TJ Web Productions, LLC, et al., US vs". Ftc.gov. 20 July 2005. Retrieved 7 January 2015.
  18. ↑ "BangBros.com, Inc., et al., US vs". Ftc.gov. Retrieved 7 January 2015.
  19. ↑ "Impulse Media Group, Inc., et al., US vs". Ftc.gov. 20 July 2005. Retrieved 7 January 2015.
  20. ↑ "NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Robert S Apgood on behalf of Defendant Impulse Media Group Inc for United States of America v. Impulse Media Group Inc :: Justia Dockets & Filings". Justia Dockets & Filings. Archived from the original on 31 March 2008. Retrieved 7 January 2015.
Daga "https://ha.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dokar_CAN-SPAM_ta_2003&oldid=700654"