Jump to content

Gudanar da muhalli na hadin gwiwa

Daga Wikipedia, Insakulofidiya ta kyauta.
Gudanar da muhalli na hadin gwiwa

Gudanar da muhalli na hadin gwiwa wata hanya ce ta gudanar da muhallar muhalli wacce ke neman lissafin rashin daidaituwa wanda zai iya faruwa a cikin tsarin zamantakewar muhalli. Ya fahimci cewa tsarin ɗan adam da na halittu masu alaƙa sun wanzu a kan ma'auni da yawa na ƙasa da na lokaci [1] kuma ta haka ne CEG ke neman gina haɗin gwiwa tsakanin 'yan wasan kwaikwayo a fadin ma'aunin da iko da yawa. [2][3]

Fa'idodin CEG

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Haɗin kai wata hanya ce ta:

  • inganta ƙarni na sabon ilimi ta hanyar ilmantarwa ta zamantakewa,
  • mafi kyau haɗa muhimman fahimta daga tsarin ilimi daban-daban,
  • yada ilimi da mafi kyawun ayyuka tsakanin 'yan wasan kwaikwayo da yawa.[4]

Sabon Ilimi ta hanyar Ilimi na Jama'a

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Rashin tabbas da ke tattare da kula da yanayin halittu da kuma kula da muhalli yana buƙatar waɗannan tsarin su dace da sabon ilmi. Haɗin gwiwar na iya sauƙaƙa irin wannan daidaitawa ta hanyar tsarin ilmantarwa na zamantakewa, wanda ake koya wa sababbin fahimta ta hanyar hulɗa tsakanin mutane, kuma wannan canji a cikin waɗannan fahimtar mutane ya wuce wannan mutum don canza fahimtar al'umma.[5][6]

Haɗin Tsarin Ilimi daban-daban

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Ta hanyar 'yan wasan kwaikwayo da yawa da ke aiki tare a cikin tsarin ilimi da yawa, ilimin asali da na gargajiya, mulkin muhalli na iya amfana daga al'ummomin da yawa waɗanda ba sa cikin al'ummar kimiyya.[7] ilimin gargajiya na iya taka muhimmiyar rawa a cikin tsarawa da kuma tsara batutuwan muhalli, amma kuma yana ba da gudummawa ga kowane bangare na tsarin yanke shawara.[8]

Hakanan akwai yiwuwar samun fa'ida ta biyu na daidaito mafi girma tsakanin 'yan wasan kwaikwayo waɗanda ke da fahimta daban-daban game da mahallinsu.[7][9] Ƙarin fahimtar adalci game da tsarin yanke shawara na iya haifar da karuwar amincewa tsakanin 'yan wasan kwaikwayo, da kuma karfafa haɗin gwiwa kanta. [10][11]

Yaduwar Ilimi

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

'Yan wasan kwaikwayo a cikin tsarin yanke shawara da waɗanda waɗannan matakai suka shafi ba koyaushe suke karɓar sabon ilmi ko fahimta cikin sauƙi ba. Ta hanyar haɓaka hanyoyin sadarwar haɗin gwiwa tsakanin 'yan wasan kwaikwayo daban-daban, sabon ilmi da fahimta na iya rarraba tsakanin hanyoyin sadarwar al'umma daban-daban.[12]

Haɗin gwiwa tsakanin masu ruwa da tsaki yana ɗaukar lokaci da albarkatu. Fahimtar lokacin da hadin gwiwa hanya ce mai inganci don magance matsaloli a cikin tsarin yanke shawara yana da mahimmanci don kada a wuce amfani da CEG.[3][13] Akwai batutuwa daban-daban a cikin tsarin zamantakewar muhalli wanda zai iya hana tasirin CEG ciki har da:

  • yanayin da ke tattare da wasu Batutuwan muhalli,
  • ƙarfin ƙarfin ƙarfin da ba daidai ba,
  • Ya karu da rikici saboda hadin gwiwa.[4]

Yanayin Matsalar Muhalli

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Yanayin yanayi na tsarin zamantakewar muhalli na iya haifar da rashin daidaituwa tsakanin cibiyoyin da yanayin halittu da zamantakewa.[14] Wasu batutuwan muhalli suna buƙatar matakai nan take, yayin da haɗin gwiwa tsakanin 'yan wasan kwaikwayo ke buƙatar shawo kan shingen farko don haɗin gwiwa, da ci gaban tsarin haɗin gwiwa.[15]

  1. Bodin, Örjan (2017). "Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems". Science. 357 (6352). doi:10.1126/science.aan1114. PMID 28818915. S2CID 29074009.
  2. Folke, Carl; Pritchard, Lowell; Berkes, Fikret; Colding, Johan; Svedin, Uno (2007). "The Problem of Fit between Ecosystems and Institutions: Ten Years Later". Ecology and Society. 12 (1). doi:10.5751/ES-02064-120130. ISSN 1708-3087. JSTOR 26267849. |hdl-access= requires |hdl= (help)
  3. 1 2 Bodin, Örjan; Robins, Garry; McAllister, Ryan; Guerrero, Angela; Crona, Beatrice; Tengö, Maria; Lubell, Mark (2016-03-29). "Theorizing benefits and constraints in collaborative environmental governance: a transdisciplinary social-ecological network approach for empirical investigations". Ecology and Society (in Turanci). 21 (1). doi:10.5751/ES-08368-210140. ISSN 1708-3087. |hdl-access= requires |hdl= (help) Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name ":0" defined multiple times with different content
  4. 1 2 Bodin, Örjan (2017-08-18). "Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems". Science (in Turanci). 357 (6352): eaan1114. doi:10.1126/science.aan1114. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 28818915. S2CID 29074009. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name ":1" defined multiple times with different content
  5. Christensen, Norman L.; Bartuska, Ann M.; Brown, James H.; Carpenter, Stephen; D'Antonio, Carla; Francis, Rober; Franklin, Jerry F.; MacMahon, James A.; Noss, Reed F.; Parsons, David J.; Peterson, Charles H. (1996). "The Report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management". Ecological Applications (in Turanci). 6 (3): 665–691. Bibcode:1996EcoAp...6..665C. doi:10.2307/2269460. ISSN 1939-5582. JSTOR 2269460. S2CID 53461068.
  6. Reed, Mark S.; Evely, Anna C.; Cundill, Georgina; Fazey, Ioan; Glass, Jayne; Laing, Adele; Newig, Jens; Parrish, Brad; Prell, Christina; Raymond, Chris; Stringer, Lindsay C. (2010). "What is Social Learning?". Ecology and Society. 15 (4). doi:10.5751/ES-03564-1504r01. ISSN 1708-3087. JSTOR 26268235.
  7. 1 2 Tengö, Maria; Brondizio, Eduardo S.; Elmqvist, Thomas; Malmer, Pernilla; Spierenburg, Marja (2014-09-01). "Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The Multiple Evidence Base Approach". Ambio (in Turanci). 43 (5): 579–591. Bibcode:2014Ambio..43..579T. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3. ISSN 1654-7209. PMC 4132468. PMID 24659474. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "doi.org" defined multiple times with different content
  8. Taylor, Brent; De Loë, Rob C. (2012-11-01). "Conceptualizations of local knowledge in collaborative environmental governance". Geoforum (in Turanci). 43 (6): 1207–1217. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.03.007. ISSN 0016-7185.
  9. Hamilton, Matthew (2018). "Understanding what shapes varying perceptions of the procedural fairness of transboundary environmental decision-making processes". Ecology and Society. 23 (4). doi:10.5751/ES-10625-230448. ISSN 1708-3087. JSTOR 26796881.
  10. Earle, Timothy C.; Siegrist, Michael (2008). "On the Relation Between Trust and Fairness in Environmental Risk Management". Risk Analysis (in Turanci). 28 (5): 1395–1414. Bibcode:2008RiskA..28.1395E. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01091.x. ISSN 1539-6924. PMID 18631299. S2CID 35656142.
  11. Berardo, Ramiro (July 2013). "The Coevolution of Perceptions of Procedural Fairness and Link Formation in Self-Organizing Policy Networks". The Journal of Politics. 75 (3): 686–700. doi:10.1017/s0022381613000455. ISSN 0022-3816.
  12. Matouš, Petr; Todo, Yasuyuki; Mojo, Dagne (2013-11-01). "Roles of extension and ethno-religious networks in acceptance of resource-conserving agriculture among Ethiopian farmers". International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 11 (4): 301–316. Bibcode:2013IJAgS..11..301M. doi:10.1080/14735903.2012.751701. ISSN 1473-5903. S2CID 153793795.
  13. Koontz, Tomas M.; Thomas, Craig W. (2006). "What Do We Know and Need to Know about the Environmental Outcomes of Collaborative Management?". Public Administration Review (in Turanci). 66 (s1): 111–121. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00671.x. ISSN 1540-6210.
  14. Rosenschöld, Johan Munck af; Honkela, Nina; Hukkinen, Janne I. (2014). "Addressing the temporal fit of institutions: the regulation of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in Europe". Ecology and Society. 19 (4). ISSN 1708-3087. JSTOR 26269671.
  15. Bodin, Örjan (2017-08-18). "Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems". Science (in Turanci). 357 (6352): eaan1114. doi:10.1126/science.aan1114. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 28818915. S2CID 29074009.