Jump to content

Rashin amincewa da Human Rights Watch

Daga Wikipedia, Insakulofidiya ta kyauta.

Kungiyar kare hakkin bil adama ta kasa da kasa Human Rights Watch ta sha suka sosai daga masu sa ido da dama. Masu sukar HRW sun hada da gwamnatocin kasa da ta bincika, kafofin yada labarai, da tsohon shugabanta Robert L. Bernstein.

Sukar gabaɗaya ta faɗi cikin nau'in son zuciya, akai-akai don mayar da martani ga rahotannin HRW. Zarge-zargen nuna son kai sun hada da yadda manufofin gwamnatin Amurka ke tasiri kungiyar, musamman dangane da rahotanni kan Yugoslavia, da Latin Amurka, da kuma yadda ake bayyana batutuwan da suka shafi kare hakkin dan Adam a kasashen Eritrea da Habasha. Zarge-zargen da ke da alaka da rikicin Larabawa da Isra'ila sun hada da ikirarin cewa HRW na nuna son kai ga Isra'ila. Kungiyar ta HRW ta mayar da martani a bainar jama'a kan sukar rahotannin da ta ke yi kan labaran Latin Amurka da rikicin Larabawa da Isra'ila.

Zarge-zarge da suka shafi Nabeel Rajab da Al Tajdeed Society (Alsafara Cult)

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

A cikin 2023, Nabeel Rajab, mai fafutukar kare hakkin dan adam daga Bahrain kuma memba na Kwamitin Ba da Shawara na Sashen Gabas ta Tsakiya na Human Rights Watch, [1] ya fuskanci zarge-zargen cin hanci da rashawa da nuna bambanci saboda dangantakar iyalinsa da kungiyar mai rikitarwa, Al Tajdeed Society. [2] Shugaban kungiyar, Redha Rajab, ɗan'uwan Nabeel ne.[3][4] Zarge-zargen sun sami karbuwa bayan dan uwan Nabeel, Dokta Ali Rajab, tsohon memba na al'umma, ya bukaci kawunsa ya jagoranci bincike don bincika zarge-zarge cewa al'umma ta kasance gaba ga wata ƙungiya kuma ta shiga cikin cin zarafi da ayyukan zamba.[5]

Dokta Ali Rajab ya yi iƙirarin cewa Abdulwahab Albasri ne ya kafa "Alsafara Cult" yayin da yake yin hukuncinsa a kurkukun Jaw a cikin shekarun 1980. [6][7] Tsoffin mambobin kungiyar, ciki har da Basema Qassab, sun goyi bayan waɗannan da'awar a cikin tambayoyinta, littattafai kuma sun nuna goyon baya ga Dr. Ali. [8] Ya zuwa ranar 16 ga Yuni, 2023, Nabeel Rajab bai yi magana a fili game da shirin Dr. Ali ba.

Bayan zarge-zargen, masu gabatar da kara na Bahrain da hukumomin yankin sun bincika kuma sun sami shaidar cin zarafin bil'adama don sarrafa mabiya waɗanda al'umma ta aikata, gami da auren tilasta da tsare-tsare ba tare da son rai ba, wanda ya haifar da yunkurin kashe kansa a wasu lokuta.[9] A ranar 21 ga Mayu, 2023, an yanke wa Redha Rajab, ɗan'uwan Nabeel kuma shugaban kungiyar AlTajdeed, hukuncin ɗaurin kurkuku.[10]

Wadannan abubuwan da suka faru sun haifar da fushi kuma sun haifar da damuwa game da shigar Nabeel da kuma motsawa tare da al'umma da ayyukanta, a cewar kafofin watsa labarai daban-daban. Akwai bincike na jama'a game da tasirin al'ummar AlTajdeed akan Nabeel Rajab ta hanyar alaƙar iyalinsa. Ya bayyana cewa dan Rajab, Adam, ya auri 'yar Hasan Mohamedi, memba na al'ummar AlTajdeed, wanda ya tsananta wa Dr. Ali Rajab a fili a kan X (tsohon Twitter). [11] An zargi Nabeel Rajab da yin amfani da tasirinsa a cikin kungiyoyin kare hakkin dan adam don tallafawa AlTajdeed kuma ya yi watsi da zargin cin zarafin bil'adama da kungiyar da kuma bukatar dan uwansa na bincika "Cult" ba tare da yin magana da su ba. [3][12]

A cikin wata hira da aka yi da shi a ranar 12 ga Yuni, 2023 da aka buga a kan Muwatin, Nabeel Rajab ya bayyana cewa a lokacin da yake kurkuku, ya raba tantanin halitta tare da fursunonin ISIS kuma ya ci gaba da kyakkyawar dangantaka da su har ma bayan an sake shi.[12] Wannan wahayi ya kara haifar da gardama game da alakarsa da Al-Tajdeed (Alsafara Cult) da kuma yin watsi da shirin dan uwansa na gudanar da bincike mara son kai game da ayyukan Cult yayin da yake kula da kyakkyawar dangantaka da masu tsattsauran ra'ayi da aka yanke musu hukunci kan zargin ta'addanci.[12] Human Rights Watch ta fitar da wata sanarwa da ke kare hakkin AlTajdeed na 'yancin magana ba tare da ambaton zargin cin zarafin' yancin dan adam da Dokta Ali Rajab ya bayyana da kuma bangaren addini ba, wanda tsoffin mambobi da yawa suka goyi bayan.[13] Sabanin haka, wasu kungiyoyi irin su Amnesty International sun dauki hanyar da ba ta nuna bambanci ba, suna fitar da wata sanarwa da ke nuna damuwa mai tsanani game da yadda kungiyar ta wulakanta mambobinta yayin da suke Allah wadai da tuhumar da jihar ta yi wa mutane saboda ra'ayoyinsu, imani, da maganganunsu.[14]

Zarge-zargen ra'ayi da zaɓin

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

A watan Mayun 2014 an buga budaddiyar wasika da ke sukar kungiyar Human Rights Watch kan abin da aka bayyana a matsayin alaka ta kut da kut da gwamnatin Amurka. Adolfo Pérez Esquivel da Mairead Corrigan, tsohon Mataimakin Sakatare Janar na Majalisar Dinkin Duniya Hans von Sponeck, Wakilin Majalisar Dinkin Duniya na Musamman kan Kare Hakkokin Dan Adam a yankin Falasdinu Richard A. Falk ne suka sanya hannu kan wasiƙar. Wasikar ta yi nuni da wasu jami'an Human Rights Watch da ke da hannu a harkokin manufofin ketare a gwamnatin Amurka, ciki har da daraktan bayar da shawarwari na Washington Tom Malinowski, wanda tsohon marubuci ne ga Madeleine Albright kuma mai ba da shawara na musamman ga Bill Clinton, sannan kuma mataimakin sakataren harkokin wajen Demokradiyya, 'Yancin Dan Adam, da Kwadago ga John Kerry, da kuma HRW na Amurka (tsohon mambobin kwamitin ba da shawara na Amurka Michael Shi) Darektan Latin Amurka na Hukumar Ba da Tallafin Demokraɗiyya ta ƙasa da gwamnatin Amurka ke bayarwa). Wasikar ta bambanta sukar da HRW ta yi wa Venezuela a matsayin dan takarar Majalisar Dinkin Duniya a cikin wata wasika zuwa ga Hugo Chavez game da rashin nuna rashin amincewa game da zaman Amurka a matsayin memba a majalisar, duk da yadda gwamnatin Amurka ta yi amfani da "jerin kisa" ga abokan gaba, ci gaba da amfani da abubuwan ban mamaki da kuma ci gaba da tsare mayakan Bayants a Guantase. Masu rattaba hannu kan yarjejeniyar sun yi kira ga kungiyar Human Rights Watch da ta haramtawa wadanda ke da hannu wajen tsarawa ko aiwatar da manufofin ketare na Amurka yin aiki a matsayin memba na ma'aikatan kungiyar, masu ba da shawara ko membobin hukumar, ko kuma a matsayin "karamin kankantar", tare da samar da dogon lokaci na sanyaya tsakanin masu aiki da HRW da kuma hidimar manufofin kasashen waje na Amurka.[15]

Malami da mai shirya ƙwadago na hagu Immanuel Ness ya rubuta cewa HRW ba ta cika yin sukar take haƙƙin ɗan adam da Amurka da ƙawayenta suke yi ba, kuma kusan koyaushe ta kan kai ga cimma matsaya da ta dace da manufofin ƙasashen yamma.

Zarge-zarge game da Latin Amurka

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Robert Naiman, darektan manufofi na Just Foreign Policy, [16] ya rubuta cewa HRW "sau da yawa yana da tasiri sosai" daga Manufofin kasashen waje na Amurka.

Venezuela

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Ayyukan Human Rights Watch a Venezuela sun zama masu kawo rigima a watan Satumbar 2008, lokacin da gwamnatin kasar ta kori ma'aikatan HRW guda biyu da ake zargi da "ayyukan adawa da gwamnati".[17] Sa'an nan Ministan Harkokin Waje Nicolás Maduro ya ce, "Waɗannan kungiyoyi, waɗanda suka yi ado a matsayin masu kare haƙƙin ɗan adam, Amurka ce ke ba da kuɗin. Sun haɗa kai da manufofin kai farmaki ga ƙasashe waɗanda ke gina sabbin samfuran tattalin arziki. " Rahoton ya nuna bambancin gwamnatin Chávez ga abokan adawar siyasa da 'yancin faɗar albarkacin baki. A cewar daya daga cikin mambobin da aka fitar, shawarar gwamnatin Venezuela ta saba wa dokar Venezuela.[18]

Bayan HRW ta buga wani rahoto (A Decade Under Chávez: Political Intolerance and Lost Opportunities for Advancing Human Rights in Venezuela) [19] wanda ke ba da labarin cin zarafin Gwamnatin Chavez, malaman 118, masu fafutuka da masu shirya fina-finai daga Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Mexico, Amurka, Burtaniya, Venezuela da sauran ƙasashe sun sanya hannu kan wasika, wanda masanan Amurka Miguel Tinker Salas, Gregory Wilpert da Greg Grandin suka rubuta, suna sukar kungiyar saboda nuna son zuciya ga Gwamnatin Venezuela. Wasikar bude ta soki rahoton, tana mai cewa "ba ta cika ko da mafi ƙarancin ka'idojin ilimi ba, rashin son kai, daidaito, ko amintacce. " Darakta na HRW Kenneth Roth ya amsa cewa wasikar ba ta nuna "duka abu da tushen kayan rahoton ba". [20][21] A lokaci guda, ɗan jaridar Irish Hugh O'Shaughnessy ya zargi HRW da amfani da bayanan ƙarya da yaudara, yana mai cewa an "sanya rahoton tare da wani nau'i na Washington da ba a san komai ba". Tom Porteous, darektan Human Rights Watch na London, ya ce O'Shaussnessy " ... ba wai kawai ya kasa samar da wata shaida ga waɗannan zarge-zargen ba", amma " ... mafi mahimmanci, ya ɓata matsayin HRW a cikin ƙudurinsa na lalata martabarmu ta duniya don daidaito da rashin son kai da rashin son rai".[a][22][23]  

Honduras

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

A ranar 21 ga watan Agustan shekara ta 2009, malamai da marubuta 93 daga Burtaniya, Amurka, Kanada, Ostiraliya, Mexico, Colombia da sauran kasashe sun buga wata wasika da ke sukar HRW ta "rashin sanarwa da rahotanni" game da take hakkin dan adam a Honduras bayan 8 ga watan Yulin shekara ta 2009, bayan juyin mulkin da aka yi a ranar 28 ga watan Yuni. [16] A cewar mawallafansa, bayan 8 ga Yuli HRW ba ta "yi fargabar kashe-kashen da ba na shari'a ba, tsare-tsare, hare-hare na zahiri, da hare-hare kan manema labarai - da yawa daga cikinsu an rubuta su sosai - waɗanda suka faru a Honduras, a mafi yawan lokuta ta hanyar juyin mulki a kan magoya bayan gwamnatin dimokuradiyya da tsarin mulki na Manuel Zelaya"; [16] sun nemi HRW ta yi wata sanarwa mai karfi game da take hakkin dan adam kuma ta gudanar da nata bincike. Wadanda suka sanya hannu a wasikar sun ce Gwamnatin Obama tana tallafawa gwamnatin Roberto Micheletti ta hanyar samar da "kudin taimako ta hanyar Asusun Millennium Challenge da sauran tushe", horar da daliban soja na Honduras a Makarantar Amurka da kuma yin watsi da halin da ake ciki na haƙƙin ɗan adam na Honduras.[16] Kwanaki hudu bayan haka, HRW ta wallafa wani taƙaitaccen bayani game da rahoton farko na haƙƙin ɗan adam na Honduras da Kotun Kare Hakkin Dan Adam ta Inter-American (IACHR) ta buga a ranar 21 ga watan Agusta [24] kuma ta ambaci rahotonta na baya (wanda aka buga har zuwa 8 ga Yuli): "Ganin girman abin da ake zargi da cin zarafin jini na yankin wanda ya haifar da manyan take hakkin dan adam, Hukumar Kare Hakkin dan adam ta Inter-Amurka.[25][24]

Zarge-zarge game da adawa da Yahudawa

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

An kuma zargi kungiyar da yin watsi da adawa da Yahudawa ko kuma kasancewa mai adawa da Bayuda kanta. A cikin jawabin da aka yi wa kungiyar Anti-Defamation League a shekara ta 2005 tsohon Ministan Harkokin Waje na Spain Ana Palacio ya ce, "NGOs kamar Human Rights Watch ko Amnesty International ba su kula da anti-Semitism ba. " [26] ADL ta kuma ce, "Yayin da Human Rights Watch ta yarda a cikin rahoton Mayu 3 cewa babu wata shaida game da kisan gilla [a Jenin] kuma cewa 'yan bindigar Palasdinawa sun ba da gudummawa ga lalata fararen fararen hula na Palasdinawa, sun ci gaba da jaddada cewa akwai shaidar Isra' yancin ya aikata laifukan yaki. "A cikin classic New York Sun Foxci" [27] A cikin classic Nework sun yi amfani da al' yancin yaki.[28] A cikin 2012, New Europe ta ce HRW "ya yi zargin ya share nassoshi a cikin rahotonta game da hadin gwiwar da ta yi a baya tare da gwamnatin Gaddafi, gami da rawar da Darakta na MENA na kungiyar, Sarah Leah Whitson, ya taka wajen tallata Saif al-Islam Gaddafi a matsayin mai gyarawa. "[29]

Rashin amincewa game da rikicin Larabawa da Isra'ila

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Zarge-zargen nuna bambanci ga Isra'ila

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

An zargi HRW da nuna bambanci ga Isra'ila da kuma kasancewa da ajanda na adawa da Isra'ila.

Robert Bernstein ya rubuta cewa ta hanyar mayar da hankali ga Isra'ila da kuma watsi da take hakkin dan adam da jihohin da ba su da 'yanci a Gabas ta Tsakiya suka yi "ban da muhimmiyar bambancin da ke tsakanin al'ummomin budewa da rufewa". A martanin da ya mayar, Aryeh Neier HRW wanda ya kafa HRW kuma tsohon darektan zartarwa ya ce, "ba daidai ba ne a ba da shawarar cewa ya kamata a yi watsi da sukar al'ummomin da ke cin zarafin bil'adama". Har ila yau Neier ya ce bambance-bambancen Robert Bernstein tsakanin "kuskuren da aka yi wajen kare kai da wadanda aka aikata da gangan" ba a cikin dokokin yaki ba kuma yana da hadari. "A kan irin wannan dalilai, kungiyoyi irin su al-Qaeda a Iraki" (wanda "kashe dubun dubatar fararen hula bayan" mamayewar Amurka ta 2003) na iya tabbatar da laifukansu.

Da yake rubutawa a mujallar Wall Street Journal a shekara ta 2009 game da wani taron tattara kudade mai cike da cece-kuce da HRW ta gudanar a birnin Riyadh na kasar Saudiyya, Nuhu Pollak ya bayyana cewa kungiyar ta nuna kyama ga Isra'ila. Pollak ya lura cewa daga shekara ta 2006 zuwa 2009 rahotannin Human Rights Watch kan rikicin Isra'ila da Larabawa sun kasance kusan gaba daya don yin Allah wadai da Isra'ila ( sukar 87 da Isra'ila ke yi kan Falasdinawa da Hizbullah, da sukar kungiyoyin Falasdinawa takwas da hudu na Hezbollah kan hare-haren Isra'ila).

Ga wani labarin Jerusalem Post, Natan Sharansky ya ce: "Ga wata kungiya da aka kirkira ta hanyar kyakkyawar niyyar duniya mai 'yanci don yaki da take hakkin dan adam, wanda ya zama kayan aiki a hannun gwamnatocin mulkin kama karya don yaki da dimokuradiyya ... Lokaci ya yi da za a kira da spade a spade. Ayyukan gaske na wannan kungiya a yau suna da nisa da aka kafa shekaru 30 da suka gabata don yin hakan: haskaka haske a wurare masu duhu inda babu wani abu da ke faruwa game da ke faruwa a cikin 'yancin' yaren' yaren shugaban HRW da aka buga. A cewar Roth, "Ta hanyar rashin riƙe waɗanda ke da alhakin lissafi, Isra'ila ta kara fushin da fushi tsakanin jama'ar Palasdinawa da kuma cikin duniyar Larabawa da yawa kuma ta rage masu matsakaici waɗanda ke son neman zaman lafiya. " [30] Wakilin Time Mideast Scott MacLeod ya rubuta a cikin Los Angeles Times cewa ba za a iya kare manufofin Isra'ila daga ƙungiyar kamar Human Rights Watch ba.[31] 

A cikin labarin da jaridar Wall Street Journal ta buga a watan Nuwamba na 2012, David Feith ya ce an yi ta muhawara mai zafi a cikin kungiyar ta HRW kan ko zargin da Iran ta yi na neman halaka Isra'ila tauye hakkin bil'adama ne. Mataimakin shugaban HRW Sid Sheinberg ya rubuta a cikin imel na cikin gida cewa bai yi komai ba yayin da Ahmadinejad ke son "kashe Yahudawa da halaka Isra'ila ... matsayi ne da bai cancanci babbar kungiyarmu ba." A cewar Kenneth Roth, "Tehran ba ta haifar da kisan kiyashi ba kuma da'awar akasin haka wani bangare ne na yunkurin buge gangunan yaki da Iran. " 

A cikin wani bincike da Kamfanin Dillancin Labarai na Yahudawa ya wallafa, Ron Kampeas ya soki rahotannin HRW cewa: “Sake gina mummunan mutuwar fararen hula da ke cike da bayanan da aka tattara a hankali sun hade tare da rudani game da mahallin da kuma hade cikin kunshin da ke daukar lalata ta Isra’ila ta asali” kuma ya yi tir da “kokarin mayar da sukar jami’an Isra’ila da sojoji gabaki daya zuwa yanke shawarar soja da Isra’ila. karfi." [32] A cewar Kampeas, rahoton HRW kan fadan da aka yi a Gaza a shekara ta 2009 "sun kasa tantance shaidu - ciki har da bidiyon sojojin Isra'ila suna rike da wuta saboda kasancewar fararen hula - da Isra'ila ta tanada don nuna cewa irin wadannan abubuwan sun banbanta da ka'ida; sun kasa nazarin matakan da Isra'ila ta dauka na hana mutuwar fararen hula, wanda zai dace da nazarin duk wani ikirarin aikata laifukan yaki".[32]

A watan Oktoba na shekara ta 2009, Robert Bernstein ya soki manufofin kungiyar a Gabas ta Tsakiya a cikin wani labari na New York Times. A cewar Bernstein, "Tare da karuwar sauyawa, [HRW] ya ware muhimmiyar bambancin da yake da shi tsakanin al'ummomin budewa da rufewa ... Yankin yana cike da gwamnatocin mulkin mallaka tare da rikodin rikodin haƙƙin ɗan adam mai ban tsoro. Duk da haka a cikin 'yancin ɗan adam Watch ya rubuta karin la'akari da Isra'ila saboda keta dokar kasa da ta kowace ƙasa a yankin. Daraktan HRW reshen Landan Tom Porteus ya amsa cewa kungiyar ta yi watsi da matakin Bernstein "bayyane ma'auni biyu. Duk wata kungiyar kare hakkin dan Adam da ta dace dole ne ta yi amfani da ka'idojin kare hakkin dan Adam iri daya ga dukkan kasashe." Watch yana da muhimmiyar rawar da zai taka wajen tattara waɗannan laifuka da kuma ba da shawarar kawo ƙarshensu." A cewar ƙungiyar, a cikin Afrilu 2009 Bernstein ya kawo damuwarsa ga kwamitin gudanarwa na HRW; Majalisar ta yi watsi da ra'ayinsa na cewa kungiyar kare hakkin bil'adama ta Human Rights Watch ta bayar da rahoto kan kungiyoyin da aka rufe kawai, tare da bayyana cikakken goyon bayanta ga ayyukan kungiyar".[33]  

Sabuwar Jamhuriyar ta wallafa wani dogon labarin game da HRW a watan Afrilu na shekara ta 2010, inda ta soki kungiyar saboda "ba da hankali sosai ga ayyukan Isra'ila". "Robert James - dan kasuwa, tsohon soja na yakin duniya na biyu, kuma memba na kwamitin ba da shawara na MENA [Middle East and North Africa Desk of HRW] wanda ya kasance yana da hannu tare da HRW kusan tun lokacin da aka kafa shi - ya kira kungiyar 'babban NGO tun lokacin Red Cross', amma ya yi jayayya cewa ba zai iya yin la'akari da shi ba. 'Bob [Bernstein, wanda ya kafa kuma tsohon shugaban HRW] yana kawo wannan batun a kan Isra'ila,' in ji shi. 'Amma Human Rights Watch yana da matsala ta asali ... Ba za su iya ɗaukar zargi ba. " [34] A cewar mujallar (yana nufin Bernstein's The New York Times op-ed), "Duk da haka, kamar yadda yake da wahala a tafi jama'a, Bernstein bai yi imani da cewa Human Rights Watch ya bar shi da zabi mai yawa ba. 'Sun yi tunanin sun ji ni,' in ji shi. 'Ka ga, suna tunanin sun saurare ni har sai ba za su iya saurare su ba. A zahiri, ba su saurara komai ba. " [34] A watan Nuwamba na shekara ta 2010 Bernstein ya gabatar da Shirley da Leonard Goldstein Lecture on Human Rights a Jami'ar Nebraska a Omaha, [35] yana zargin HRW da "kuskuren Isra'ila a matsayin babban mai laifi" a cikin rikici na Isra'ila da Falasdinu kuma yana ba da shawarar cewa kungiyoyin kare hakkin dan adam ne ke da alhakin rarraba makarantun jami'a.[ing] 

A cikin shafinta na The Washington Post, Jennifer Rubin ta bayyana HRW a matsayin "kungiyar adawa da Isra'ila da ke nuna kansa a matsayin wanda ya sadaukar da kansa ga haƙƙin ɗan adam". Orlando Radice ya ce game da hira da ya yi da Kenneth Roth don The Jewish Chronicle, "Wannan ba wata hira ba ce fiye da motsa jiki a musantawa, rikicewa da kuma tsohuwar tantancewa".[36]

A cikin imel a ranarta ta ƙarshe a HRW, Danielle Haas, babbar edita mai barin gado, ta zargi ƙungiyar da siyasantar da aikinta kan rikicin Isra'ila da Falasdinu. Ta bayyana damuwa game da martanin HRW ga kisan kiyashin Hamas a Isra'ila a ranar 7 ga Oktoba, inda ta bayyana cewa "shekaru na rikice-rikice na hukumomi sun ƙare a cikin martani na ƙungiyoyi wanda ya rushe kwarewa, watsi da ka'idodin daidaito da adalci, da kuma mika wuya ga kare hakkin bil'adama".

Garlasco incident

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

An soki babban mai binciken HRW SS="cx-link" data-linkid="180" href="./Marc_Garlasco" id="mwAa4" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Marc Garlasco">Marc Garlasco saboda tattara abubuwan tunawa na Nazi, kuma Emma Daly ta tabbatar ba tare da bayani ba a watan Maris na 2010 cewa Garlasco ya yi murabus daga Human Rights Watch a watan da ya gabata. Garlasco, wanda ya rubuta wani littafi game da lambobin yabo na zamanin Nazi, wanda aka buga a shafin yanar gizon mai tarawa: "Wannan yana da kyau sosai! Jaket din SS na fata yana sa jinin na ya yi sanyi sosai yana da COOL!"[37] Ron Dermer, sannan darektan manufofin Benjamin Netanyahu, ya ce game da Garlasco mai binciken laifukan yaki wanda yake mai son tarawa da kuma ɗan kasuwa a cikin abubuwan tunawa da Nazi ya ce watakila sabon abu ne mai suna Watch (wanda ya nuna rashin gaskiya ga masu kulawar ɗan adam) Helena ya nuna cewa yaƙi da yaƙi da yawa gaisuwar ɗan adam yaƙi da ɗan adam ya nuna cewa Garbanci yaƙi yaƙi ya zama sananne) [38][39]

A cewar kungiyar Garlasco "ya rufe Iraki a matsayin babban mai sharhi na leken asiri a Pentagon",[./Criticism_of_Human_Rights_Watch#cite_note-60 [1]] kuma jaridar The Guardian ta ruwaito cewa ya shafe shekaru bakwai yana wannan aiki. Ya kasance babban jami'in kima da aka yi niyya a lokacin yakin Iraki a 2003, a kan Operation Desert Fox (Iraq) Battle Assessment Team in 1998 kuma ya jagoranci wata tawagar tantance lalacewar yakin Pentagon zuwa Kosovo a 1999. Garlasco kuma ya shiga cikin tambayoyi sama da 50 a matsayin kwararre kan al'amura.

A wani bangare na jaridar The National, Alan Philps ya rubuta cewa "Gwamnatin Netanyahu da magoya bayanta sun tashi tsaye don lalata sahihancin hukumar kare hakkin bil'adama ta Majalisar Dinkin Duniya da kuma dukkanin kungiyoyi masu zaman kansu (NGOs) da ke aiki a fagen kare hakkin bil'adama ... Manufar ita ce a haramta kungiyar a daidai lokacin da bincike kan hakkinta ya zo daidai da wasu daga cikin ra'ayoyin shugaban Amurka Barack Obama. "[40] 

A cewar marubuci ma’aikacin Christian Science Monitor Robert Marquand, rahoton Majalisar Dinkin Duniya na “masanin shari’a Richard Goldstone, shugaban hukumar gaskiya da sasantawa ta Afirka ta Kudu, babban mai shigar da kara na kotun hukunta laifukan yaki ta Yugoslavia” ya nuna amfani da farin-phosphorus ba bisa ka’ida ba daidai da shaidar shaidar gani da ido Garlasco da aka bayar ga Monitor. Marquand ya rubuta cewa ba daidai ba ne ... a yi amfani da Garlasco don kawar da kai daga ko ɓoye binciken da aka yi cewa laifukan yaƙi da cin zarafin bil adama sun faru a Gaza".[41] 

Tattara kudade

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

A ranar 7 ga Satumba, 2010, an sanar da cewa George Soros ya shirya ba da gudummawar dala miliyan 100 ga Human Rights Watch. [42] 

''Yan jarida sun soki kungiyar kare hakkin bil'adama ta Human Rights Watch da neman, karfafawa ko kuma karbar gudummawar kudi a Saudiyya da kuma hanyoyin tattara kudade. Masu sukar sun yi zargin cewa waɗannan hanyoyin sun haɗa da bayanin "yaƙe-yaƙe" na HRW da jayayya da Isra'ila da magoya bayanta. A cewar mawallafin jaridar The Jerusalem Post Herb Keinon da Jeffrey Goldberg, wakilin jaridar The Atlantic kuma tsohon marubucin JP, wannan ya kawo cikas ga amincin HRW. A wata musanya ta imel, Goldberg ya tambayi Kenneth Roth ko an tara kudade don yakar kungiyoyin masu fafutuka masu goyon bayan Isra'ila. Roth ya amsa da cewa: "A fili yake Saudiyya na sane da irin hare-haren da 'yan adawa daban-daban na Isra'ila suke kai mana. Kowa da kowa," ya kara da cewa wadannan korafe-korafe sun zama ruwan dare a cikin "tattaunawa" a lokacin tattara kudade ba wai kawai ga Saudi Arabia ba.[43]

David Bernstein na Makarantar shari'a ta Jami'ar George Mason ya rubuta cewa wani abu ba daidai ba ne lokacin da kungiyar kare hakkin dan adam ta tafi daya daga cikin kasashe mafi munin duniya don tara kudi don yin doka da Isra'ila", kodayake Inter Press Service daga baya ya ce ya nemi gafara don bayar da shawarar cewa HRW ba ta tattauna cin zarafin 'yancin dan adam na Saudiyya ba a lokacin tarurruka.

A cewar kungiyar kare hakkin bil'adama ta Human Rights Watch, zargin da ake yi wa HRW ta "lalata tsakani" ta hanyar ganawa da masu ba da agaji na Saudiyya ya dogara ne kan "zato da ba daidai ba." HRW ta lura cewa ma'aikatan sun gabatar da gabatarwa guda biyu a watan Mayun 2009 a cikin gidajen Saudiyya masu zaman kansu ga mutanen da ke sha'awar kungiyar. Daga cikin mutane 50 da aka kiyasta a liyafar Riyadh, uku suna da alaka da gwamnati: "Mai magana da yawun ma'aikatar harkokin cikin gida, mataimakin shugaban hukumar kare hakkin bil'adama, wata kungiyar gwamnati; da kuma memba na majalisar Shura, kwamitin tuntuba da gwamnati ta nada". [44] A cewar HRW, babu wani daga cikin waɗannan mutane da aka nemi kuɗi; HRW ba ta karɓi kuɗi daga jami'an gwamnati a kowace ƙasa ba, [45] kuma babu dalilin da ya sa 'yan ƙasar Saudiyya ba za su iya son tallafawa' yancin ɗan adam su iya tallafawa'ad da dama ba.[45]

HRW ta gaya wa Inter Press Service cewa ra'ayin "cewa duk wani kudi daga Saudi Arabia ya lalace saboda ya fito ne daga kasar da ke da mulkin kama karya babban abu ne ... Tarihin kabilanci na masu ba da gudummawa ba shi da mahimmanci ga aikin da muke yi ... Ba ya dace da aikinmu a Isra'ila cewa da yawa, da yawa daga cikin masu ba da agaji Yahudawa ne. Kuma ba shi da dacewa ga aikin da muka yi cewa muna samun kuɗi daga ƙasashen Larabawa. " A cewar kungiyar, an tattauna aikinta a Saudi Arabia, gami da "kunan mallaki 'yancin mata, hukuncin mutuwar yara, ma'aikatan gida, da nuna bambanci ga' yan tsiraru na addini", a wurin liyafar.[45] HRW ta kuma ce, "Babu wata kungiya ta kare hakkin dan adam da ta samar da cikakken aiki, daki-daki, da kuma cikakken aiki a kan batutuwan kare hakkin dan Adam na Saudi Arabia a cikin 'yan shekarun nan fiye da Human Rights Watch".[45] Kodayake an rufe halin da ake ciki a Gaza, HRW ta yi iƙirarin cewa an tabbatar da ɗaukar hoto tun lokacin da yaƙin Gaza ya mamaye manyan labarai na duniya kuma batun yanki ne a Saudi Arabia. An zargi HRW a matsayin mai adawa da Isra'ila da zargin da HRW ke fuskanta a yawancin Gabas ta Tsakiya cewa HRW tana da taushi kan take hakkin dan adam na Isra'ila.[45]  

A cikin 2008, HRW ta ba da rahotanni guda ɗaya na kasashe da yawa da guda biyar da ke sukar gwamnatin Saudi Arabiya.[46] A watan Agustan 2009 kungiyar ta fitar da wani rahoto mai suna "Hakkin Dan Adam da Martani na Yaki da Ta'addanci na Saudiyya: Shawarar Addini, Tsare Tsare Tsare Tsare, da Laifin Shari'a", tare da sukar shirin gwamnatin Saudiyya na yaki da ta'addanci.[47]

A cikin 2023 MEMRI ta buga wata takarda ta Quatari da aka leka wacce ta ambaci gudummawar dalar Amurka miliyan 3 ga HRW a cikin 2018.[48]

Shawan Jabarin nadin

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

A cikin Fabrairun 2011, HRW ta nada Shawan Jabarin a Kwamitin Ba da Shawarar Gabas ta Tsakiya. Kotun kolin Isra'ila ta kira Jabarin da "Dr. Jekyll da Mr. Hyde" saboda rawar da ya taka a cikin 'yan gwagwarmayar fafutukar 'yantar da Falasdinu da kuma kungiyar kare hakkin bil'adama ta Al Haq. Matakin da HRW ta dauka na sanya Jabarin a cikin kwamitinta na yankin Gabas ya janyo suka.

Amsa ga zargi

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Daraktan shirin HRW Iain Levine ya ce a watan Agustan shekara ta 2009, "Idan gwamnatin Isra'ila tana so ta yi shiru ga masu sukar, ya kamata ta bincika zarge-zargen rashin laifi kuma ta dauki mataki don kawo karshen cin zarafin. [49] A cikin wani op-ed na Jerusalem Post a wancan watan, Kenneth Roth ya rubuta cewa rahotannin cin zarafin dan Adam na Isra'ila na baya-bayan nan ya haifar da gagarumin kamfen da gwamnatin Isra'ila da wasu magoya bayanta da ba sa so su yi na lalata manzannin da kuma canza batun. A cewar Roth, "matsalar ba manzon da ke dauke da labarai na wannan rashin da'a ba, ko Alkali Goldstone ko kungiyoyin kare hakkin dan Adam da suka kasance makasudin yakin neman zabe da gwamnatin Isra'ila da wasu magoya bayanta suka kaddamar. Matsalar ita ce halin sojojin Isra'ila. Intifada - da wuya ta sake tabbatar wa duk wanda ke tunanin cewa kungiyoyin kare hakkin bil'adama su kasance masu zaman kansu ba tare da bangaranci ba.[50]

A cikin wani op-ed na Jerusalem Post a wancan watan, Kenneth Roth ya rubuta cewa hotunan cin damar dan Adam na Isra'ila na baya-bayan nan ya zo da shirin kamfen da bidiyo Isra'ila da wasu magoya bayanta da ba sa so su yi na lalata manzannin da kuma canza batun. A cewar Roth, "matsalar ba manzon da ke dauke da labarai na wannan rashin da'a ba, ko Alkali Goldstone ko alamun kare hakkin dan Adam da suka kasance makasudin yakin neman zabe da sunan Isra'ila da wasu magoya bayanta suka koma. Matsalar ita ce halin sojojin Isra'ila". Wani rukuni na kungiyoyin kare hakkin Isra'ila 10 sun zargi gwamnatin Isra'ila da yunkurin "haɓaka tsoro da shiru ko faɗakar da kungiyoyi masu muhimmanci" waɗanda ke shiga cikin jawabin jama'a.[39]

Rashin amincewa daga gwamnatin Masar

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

A ranar 14 ga watan Agustan shekarar 2014 ne ‘yan sandan Masar suka tarwatsa zanga-zangar goyon bayan Morsi a dandalin Rabaa al-Adawiya da dandalin Nahda, wanda ya yi sanadiyar mutuwar mutane 638, 43 daga cikinsu jami’an ‘yan sanda ne, a cewar ma’aikatar lafiya ta Masar, HRW ta buga wani rahoto wanda ta zargi jami’an tsaron kasar da laifin wuce gona da iri. gwamnati. Adadin wadanda HRW ta kashe ya kai daga 817 zuwa kusan 1000. HRW ta bayyana cewa mai yiwuwa abin da 'yan sandan suka yi ya zama "laifi na cin zarafin bil'adama".[51]

Sai dai a wata sanarwa da hukumar yada labaran kasar ta fitar, gwamnatin Masar ta soki kungiyar ta HRW, inda ta yi zargin cewa rahoton kungiyar ba shi da gaskiya, ya yi watsi da tashe-tashen hankula da masu zanga-zangar suka yi, da kuma nuna son kai ga kungiyar 'yan uwa musulmi. Sakamakon buga rahoton, babban darektan Kenneth Roth da Daraktar Gabas ta Tsakiya da Arewacin Afirka Sarah Leah Whitson, da ke aiki da HRW, wadanda za su gabatar da rahoton ga 'yan jarida da jami'an diflomasiyya, hukumomi sun tsare sa'o'i na sa'o'i tare da fitar da su daga Masar.

A cikin wata sanarwa da ma'aikatar harkokin cikin gida ta Masar ta fitar a shafinta na Facebook, an zargi kungiyar ta HRW da yin aiki ba bisa ka'ida ba a Masar ba tare da izini daga hukumomi ba.

Rashin amincewa daga gwamnatin Habasha da kungiyoyin kare hakkin dan adam na gida

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

1991 - Maris 2018: Jam'iyyar Juyin Juya Halin Jama'ar Habasha da ke karkashin jagorancin Habasha

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

A shekara ta 2009, a lokacin mulkin da jam'iyyar People's Revolutionary Democratic Front ta Habasha ta yi, gwamnatin Habasha ta gabatar da tambayoyi game da hanyoyin HRW, inda ta gabatar da wani rahoto da ya yi watsi da "Human Rights Watch zargin cin zarafin da ake yi a Ogaden a matsayin jita-jita da kuma hanyoyinta a matsayin tsinke.

A farkon shekarun 2010, Hukumar Kare Hakkin Dan Adam ta Habasha (EHRC) ta yi jayayya da amincin zarge-zargen Roth cewa gwamnatin Habasha tana da cin hanci da rashawa kuma tana amfani da kudaden tallafin kasa da kasa don "ma'anar zalunci". EHRC ta zargi Roth da rashin son kai wanda ya haifar da sha'awar "ƙuntata ... masu arziki masu ba da kuɗi. " Ya ambaci kimantawarsa game da Shirin Cibiyar Demokradiyya (DIP) a matsayin "marasa kyau" kuma ya ce zarginsa na cin hanci da rashawa ya dogara ne akan "ƙayyadadden hanyar". EHRC kuma ta kira shawarwarinta "rashin jituwa" wanda ya kira "don inganta haƙƙin ɗan adam a kan kuɗin shirye-shiryen haƙƙin ɗan Adam da masu aiwatar da su".[52]

Afrilu 2018 - yanzu: Jam'iyyar Prosperity Party-led Habasha

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

 

Yunkurin gurfanar da gwamnatin Bangladesh ta yi na HRW

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Wata kotu ta musamman da ke kula da laifuffukan yaki a lokacin yakin ‘yancin kai da Bangladesh ta yi da Pakistan a shekarar 1971, ta bukaci kungiyar Human Rights Watch ta bayyana dalilin da ya sa ba za a tuhume ta da laifin raina kotu ba saboda wata sanarwa da kungiyar ta fitar na cewa shari’ar da ake yi wa tsohon shugaban jam’iyyar Islama Ghulam Azam “na da kura-kurai sosai” kuma bai cika ka’idojin kasa da kasa ba. An yankewa Azam hukuncin daurin shekaru 90 a gidan yari saboda laifukan yaki. Jakadan Amurka a Bangladesh ya nuna damuwarsa kan matakin da masu gabatar da kara suka dauka kan kungiyar.[53]

Rashin amincewa daga gwamnatin Vietnam da kungiyoyin jihohi

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Sakamakon matsayin kasar Vietnam a matsayin kasa mai ra'ayin gurguzu mai jam'iyya daya, kasar Vietnam ta kasance kasar da ake yawan fuskantar suka da kuma zargi daga kungiyar HRW, wanda ya haifar da martani mai karfi da suka da yawancin sassan gwamnatin Vietnam suka yi wa kungiyar.

A cikin 2024, yin tsokaci game da zargin wariyar launin fata da aka ce yana da alaƙa da harin 2023 Đắk Lắk, Ma'aikatar Harkokin Wajen ƙasar ta soki tare da yin Allah wadai da HRW saboda "bayanan da ba su dace ba da ƙirƙira a cikin rahotanninsu". Jami'in diflomasiyyar na Vietnam ya ambaci cewa "ba shi ne karon farko da wannan kungiya ta gabatar da irin wadannan zarge-zarge na nuna son kai ba tare da mugun nufi ga Vietnam, da nufin yin zagon kasa ga ci gaban zamantakewa da tattalin arziki da haifar da sabani tsakanin Vietnam da kasashen duniya". [54] [55]

Jaridar People's Army Newspaper, kamfanin dillancin labarai na rundunar sojojin kasar Vietnam, ta bayyana rahotannin HRW a kan Vietnam a matsayin "marasa hankali", "mayaudari" da "marasa tushe". Jaridar ta kuma zargi HRW da goyon bayan kungiyoyi masu adawa da zamantakewa, da nufin aiwatar da juyin juya halin launin fata a kan jihohin da ake da su, yayin da kuma ba da shawara da kuma yaba wa masu adawa da gwamnati ba bisa ka'ida ba da kuma masu gwagwarmayar adawa da gwamnati a Vietnam.[56] A halin da ake ciki, Jaridar Tsaro ta Sojoji ta bayyana kungiyar a matsayin "marasa hankali da ban mamaki", inda ta nuna shakku kan cancantar HRW na bayyana ayyukanta, hakki da hukunce-hukuncen da take da su na "bikan hakkin bil'adama a duniya" ta hanyar "tsatsa cikin harkokin cikin gida na kasashe", tare da lura da cewa HRW kungiya ce mai zaman kanta amma a kullum tana kokarin neman gwamnatoci su yi duk abin da suka dace da kuma gamsar da manufofinta.[57]

Dubi kuma

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]
  • Rashin amincewa da Amnesty International
  • Rashin amincewa da Greenpeace

Bayanan da aka ambata

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]
  1. ↑ "Middle East and North Africa Division". Human Rights Watch (in Turanci). 2015-05-11. Retrieved 2023-06-16.
  2. ↑ "لماذا كلّ هذا الغضب تجاه نبيل رجب؟!". www.annaharar.com. Retrieved 2023-06-16.
  3. 1 2 Northlines (2023-03-10). "International Outcry Against Prosecution Of Bahrain Religious Reformers - Northlines" (in Turanci). Archived from the original on 2023-06-16. Retrieved 2023-06-16.
  4. ↑ "Bahrain charges religious reformers for questioning Islam – Middle East Monitor" (in Turanci). 2023-02-21. Retrieved 2023-06-16.
  5. ↑ "Rattibha". en.rattibha.com. Retrieved 2023-06-16.
  6. ↑ Dorsey, Dr James M. (2023-03-04). "Bahrain prosecutes religious reformers: traditionalists fight back". Modern Diplomacy (in Turanci). Retrieved 2023-06-16.
  7. ↑ "Rattibha". en.rattibha.com. Retrieved 2023-06-16.
  8. ↑ القصاب, باسمة (2023-03-06). "باسمة القصاب تقر بمعاناة المنشقين عن الامر". Twitter (in Larabci). Retrieved 2023-06-16.
  9. ↑ "المحكمة الجنائية تصدر حكمها بحق متهمي جمعية التجديد". جريدة البلاد (in Larabci). Retrieved 2023-06-16.
  10. ↑ "تأييد الحبس لمدانان من أعضاء "جمعية التجديد"". Watan (in Arabic). 2023-05-21. Retrieved 2023-06-16.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
  11. ↑ "عضو جمعية التجديد حسن محمدي يتعرض للدكتور علي رجب بكلمات بها ايحاءات جنسية خادشة للحياء باللغة". Twitter (in Larabci). 2023-05-02. Retrieved 2023-06-16.
  12. 1 2 3 خليفة, ريم (2023-06-12). "حول سنوات السجن والكتابة وحقوق الإنسان.. حوار مع نبيل رجب". مواطن (in Larabci). Retrieved 2023-06-16.
  13. ↑ "Bahrain: 3 On Trial for Religious Dialogue". Human Rights Watch (in Turanci). 2023-02-28. Retrieved 2023-06-16.
  14. ↑ Bahrain, Amnesty (2023-03-03). "Amnesty statement on Altajdeed prosecution". Twitter (in Larabci). Retrieved 2023-06-16.
  15. ↑ "Nobel Peace Laureates to Human Rights Watch: Close Your Revolving Door to U.S. Government". AlterNet. 12 May 2014. Archived from the original on 5 November 2018. Retrieved 10 December 2016.
  16. 1 2 3 4 Grandin, Greg; Adrienne Pine (22 August 2009). "Over 90 Experts Call on Human Rights Watch to Speak Out on Honduras Abuses". Common Dreams. Archived from the original on 29 August 2009. Retrieved 22 August 2009.
  17. ↑ Kenneth Roth (19 September 2008). "Venezuela: Human Rights Watch Delegation Expelled". Human Rights Watch. Retrieved 24 February 2015.
  18. ↑ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named ":0".
  19. ↑ "A Decade Under Chávez". Human Rights Watch. 22 September 2008. Retrieved 24 February 2015.
  20. ↑ "Taking Human Rights Watch to Task on the Question of Venezuela's Purported Abuse of Human Rights: Over 100 U.S. and Foreign Scholars Take Issue with the head of HRW's Latin American Division". Coha.org. 18 December 2008. Retrieved 24 February 2015.
  21. ↑ "Human Rights Watch Responds to Criticism of Venezuela Report | North American Congress on Latin America". North American Congress on Latin America. 5 January 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2013.
  22. ↑ "HRW v Chavez". New Statesman. 26 September 2008. Retrieved 24 February 2015.
  23. ↑ "HRW v Chavez II". Newstatesman.com. 30 September 2008. Retrieved 24 February 2015.
  24. 1 2 Human Rights Watch (25 August 2009). "Honduras: Rights Report Shows Need for Increased International Pressure". Human Rights Watch. Archived from the original on 28 August 2009. Retrieved 28 August 2009.
  25. ↑ "Preliminary Observations on the IACHR Visit to Honduras". Inter-American Court of Human Rights. 21 August 2009. Archived from the original on 30 August 2009. Retrieved 26 August 2009.
  26. ↑ "Anti-Semitism in Europe: Fighting Back". Adl.org. Archived from the original on 7 October 2012. Retrieved 24 February 2015.
  27. ↑ "Anatomy of Anti-Israel Incitement: Jenin, World Opinion and the Massacre That Wasn't". Adl.org. Archived from the original on 17 October 2012. Retrieved 28 January 2013.
  28. ↑ "No Accident - The New York Sun". Nysun.com. 2 August 2006. Retrieved 28 January 2013.
  29. ↑ "Human Rights Watch slammed over anti-Israeli and pro-Gaddafi reports". Neurope.eu. 9 January 2012. Archived from the original on 4 May 2013. Retrieved 28 January 2013.
  30. ↑ Roth, Kenneth (27 October 2009). "Haaretz: Human Rights Watch applies same standards to Israel, Hamas". Haaretz.com. Retrieved 28 January 2013.
  31. ↑ "Sneak attack on Human Rights Watch - Los Angeles Times". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 2 October 2020. Retrieved 1 November 2009.
  32. 1 2 Kampeas, Ron (20 August 2009). "Facts, fiction and fury in the battle of human rights groups vs. Israel | Jewish Telegraphic Agency". Jta.org. Retrieved 24 February 2015.
  33. ↑ "Human Rights Watch: Why We Report on 'Open' Societies". Hrw.org. 20 October 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2013.
  34. 1 2 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named "tnr.com".
  35. ↑ "The Shirley and Leonard Goldstein Lecture on Human Rights at the University of Nebraska". Unomaha.edu. Archived from the original on 2012-07-16. Retrieved 2013-01-28.
  36. ↑ "Censorship? Never, this is Human Rights Watch | The Jewish Chronicle". Thejc.com. 8 February 2013. Retrieved 24 February 2015.
  37. ↑ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named "Garlasco accused".
  38. ↑ Keinon, Herb (9 September 2009). "'HRW expert collects Nazi memorabilia' - Israel - Jerusalem Post". Jpost.com. Retrieved 24 February 2015.
  39. 1 2 Corey Flintoff (16 September 2009). "Rights Analyst Suspended Over Nazi-Era Collection". NPR. Retrieved 24 February 2015.
  40. ↑ - Monday (13 December 2012). "The National: Israeli defense depends on attacking the messenger". Thenational.ae. Archived from the original on 26 February 2014. Retrieved 28 January 2013.
  41. ↑ "Christian Science Monitor: Gaza war analyst: Does his Nazi-era collection indicate bias?". Features.csmonitor.com. 17 September 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2013.
  42. ↑ "George Soros to Give $100 million to Human Rights Watch | Human Rights Watch". Hrw.org. 7 September 2010. Retrieved 24 February 2015.
  43. ↑ "Fundraising Corruption at Human Rights Watch - Jeffrey Goldberg - The Atlantic". Jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com. 15 July 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2013.
  44. ↑ "Visit to Saudi Arabia and False Allegations of Human Rights Watch 'Bias' | Human Rights Watch". Hrw.org. Archived from the original on 15 March 2015. Retrieved 24 February 2015.
  45. 1 2 3 4 5 "Human Rights Watch Visit to Saudi Arabia". Human Rights Watch. Archived from the original on 22 July 2009. Retrieved 4 December 2016.
  46. ↑ "Human Rights Watch - Reports". Human Rights Watch. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
  47. ↑ "Saudi Arabia: Counterterrorism Efforts Violate Rights". Human Rights Watch. 10 August 2009. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
  48. ↑ i24NEWS (2023-11-23). "Human Rights Watch under fire for allegedly accepting millions in Qatar funds". I24news (in Turanci). Retrieved 2023-11-24.
  49. ↑ "False Allegations about Human Rights Watch's Latest Gaza Report". Human Rights Watch. 14 August 2009. Archived from the original on 17 August 2009. Retrieved 17 August 2009.
  50. ↑ Roth, Kenneth (25 August 2009). "Right of Reply: Don't smear the messenger - Opinion - Jerusalem Post". Jpost.com. Retrieved 24 February 2015.
  51. ↑ "All According to Plan". Human Rights Watch. 12 August 2014. Retrieved 23 February 2016.
  52. ↑ "EHRC Response on Human Rights Watch Reports on Ethiopia". EHRC. Archived from the original on 25 July 2012.
  53. ↑ "Bangladesh court asks Human Rights Watch why it shouldn't be charged with contempt". Fox News. Archived from the original on 5 December 2013. Retrieved 5 November 2013.
  54. ↑ "Spokeswoman: Investigation into Dak Lak incident in line with law". VietnamPlus (in Turanci). Vietnam News Agency. 2024-01-25. Retrieved 2024-01-26. Regarding a recent press release by the Human Rights Watch (HRW) in which 2023 human rights situation in Vietnam was mentioned, Hang completely rejected and condemned the so-called HRW, which delivered a report with fabricated and false content.
    According to her, it was not the first time this organisation had presented such biased allegations with malicious intent against Vietnam, aiming to undermine the country’s socio-economic development and sow discord between Vietnam and the international community.
  55. ↑ "Đắk Lắk terrorism attacks: No ethnic discrimination in Việt Nam, foreign ministry says". Việt Nam News (in Turanci). Vietnam News Agency. Retrieved 2024-01-26. Responding to queries regarding the contents related to Việt Nam's human rights situation as claimed in the World Report 2024 from Human Rights Watch, the spokesperson said Việt Nam completely refutes and condemns "the so-called Human Rights Watch for the factually inaccurate and fabricated information in their report."<be>Hằng noted that this is not the first time that this organisation has put forward accusatory arguments with malicious intent, targeting Việt Nam and aiming to sabotage socio-economic development and create a distance between the international community and Việt Nam.
  56. ↑ Trần, Lâm (2022-02-22). "Mưu đồ phía sau cái gọi là bản phúc trình "Nhốt chúng tôi ở trong nhà"" [Conspiracy behinds the “Locked Inside Our Home” report]. People's Army Newspaper (in Harshen Biyetinam). Vietnam People's Army.
  57. ↑ Nguyễn, Trung. "HRW - phi lý và kỳ quái" [HRW - absurd and bizarre]. National Defence Journal. Central Military Commission of the Communist Party of Vietnam and the Vietnam Ministry of National Defence. Archived from the original on 2024-01-26. Retrieved 2024-01-26.
Daga "https://ha.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rashin_amincewa_da_Human_Rights_Watch&oldid=746931"