Jump to content

Tsarin rushewa

Daga Wikipedia, Insakulofidiya ta kyauta.
Tsarin rushewa
scientific model (en) Fassara da physical geography (en) Fassara
Bayanai
Bisa The Geographical Cycle (en) Fassara da O Ciclo Geográfico (en) Fassara
Maƙirƙiri William Morris Davis (mul) Fassara
Amfani wajen Ilimin Kimiyyar Juyin Sifar Kasa (Geomorphology)

Tsarin ƙasa, ko sake zagayowar rushewa, samfurin da ya dace wanda ke bayyana ci gaban taimako a cikin shimfidar wurare.[1] Misali ya fara ne tare da rushewar da ke biyo bayan hauhawar ƙasa sama da matakin tushe kuma ya ƙare, idan yanayin ya ba da izini, a cikin samar da peneplain.[1] Yankunan da ke nuna shaidar fiye da sau ɗaya na rushewa ana kiransu "polycyclical".[1] Tsarin rushewa da wasu ra'ayoyin da ke tattare da shi, duk da shahararsu, sun kasance batun zargi da yawa.

Bayyanawa

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

William Morris Davis, wanda ya samo asali na samfurin, ya raba shi zuwa matasan wanda sauyawa ya yi kama da rayuwar ɗan adam watau matasan matasan Matsala, Matasa Matashi Matasa da Tsohon Matasa.[2] Misali ya fara ne da wani uplifted sate na wuri mai faɗi.[3] Sa'an nan Davis ya bayyana wani mataki na matasa inda yankan kogi ko rushewar tsaye shine babban tsari da ke tsara wuri mai faɗi. A lokacin tsayin matashi, bambance-bambance tsakanin tsaunuka da ƙasan kwari suna ƙaruwa da sauri. Mataki na matasa yana biye da wani mataki na balaga wanda bambance-bambance na tsawo tsakanin ƙasan kwari da tsaunuka suna da girma. A cikin matakin balaga, raguwar gangara ya zama abin da ya fi muhimmanci yayin da rushewar gefen ya mamaye, kuma tsaunuka sun rasa tsawo da sauri fiye da koguna, yadda ya kamata ya rage taimako.[4] A cikin sabon mataki, rushewar ta yi aiki na dogon lokaci har da wuri mai faɗi, duk da tsayinsa na asali, an rage shi zuwa ƙasa mai juyawa. Wannan wuri mai sauƙi ana kiransa peneplain kuma yana iya ƙunsar tsawo da ke tsaye daga matakin gaba ɗaya. Za'a iya ɗaga peneplain, wanda ke fara zagaye na biyu na rushewa.[5]

daji ya yarda cewa cikakken sake zagayowar lamari ne na musamman kuma cewa haɓakawa na farko ba lallai ba ne ko kuma ya biyo bayan dogon lokaci na kwanciyar hankali. Koyaya, kamar yadda Walther Penck ya nuna, Davis da mabiyansa galibi suna amfani da saurin haɓaka da kwanciyar hankali don bayyana shimfidar wurare. Wannan yana nufin cewa samfurin, kamar yadda yawancin suka fahimta, yana ɗaukar saurin tashi da kuma tasowa.[6] Wani halayyar samfurin shine cewa gangaren suna samo asali ne ta hanyar raguwa, tare da gangaren da suka fi tsayi da aka yi amfani da su ta hanyar rushewa wanda ke samar da gangaren masu sauƙi. [A] Rashin ƙarfi na samfurin shine cewa galibi yana da ka'idoji da ƙididdiga a cikin yanayi kuma ba ya la'akari da rikitarwa na motsi na tectonic ko Canjin yanayi. Yanayin matakai na sama ma ba shi da kyau ta hanyar samfurin.[6] Misali a cikin asalinsa an yi niyya ne don bayyana ci gaban taimako a cikin shimfidar wurare masu matsakaici wanda lalacewa ta hanyar ruwa mai gudana ana ɗaukarsa muhimmiyar mahimmanci.[5][6] Duk da haka, an tsawaita sake zagayowar rushewa, tare da gyare-gyare, cikin busasshiyar, rabin busasshi, Savannah, selva, glacial, bakin teku, karst da yankunan periglacial.[6][7] Rubuta a cikin 1950 Louis C. Peltier ya yi iƙirarin sake zagayowar lalacewa a cikin yanayin teku da yanayin yanayi shine kawai wanda ba a bayyana shi dalla-dalla ba.[7]

Bambance-bambance na sake zagayowar rushewa
Muhalli An gabatar da shi ta hanyar Bayani
Rashin ruwa Davis, 1905 A farkon sake zagayowar rushewa a cikin yanayin busasshiyar yanayi akwai ƙananan kwari da yawa inda ake wanke kayan a lokacin abubuwan da ke faruwa na ruwan sama. A mataki na gaba (mataki na matasa) ana haɓaka kwari kuma waɗannan sun rarraba tsaunuka. Kyakkyawan gangara da kwari sun tara kayan da aka samo daga tsaunuka. A cikin tsufa, tafkunan ruwa sun haɗu. A ƙarshe, an kai wani mataki inda filin ya rasa yawancin sauƙin sa kuma ramukan raguwa suna tsoma baki tare da tsarin magudanar ruwa, suna karya shi cikin tsarin gida. A duk matakai ana iya fitar da yashi da ƙura ta iska zuwa wasu wurare.[8]
Dajin daji Cotton, 1942 [7] Garin sama yana hana rushewar tuddai.[7] Hillslopes suna da ƙasa mai kauri.[7]
Rashin ruwa Cotton, 1942 [7] Hanyoyi tare da sake zagayowar tsakiya na savannah tsakanin bambance-bambance "na al'ada" da busasshiyar.[7]
Savanna Cotton, 1942 [7] An haɗa shi da inselbergs da pediplains.[7][9] Koguna ba su da isasshen ruwa don lalata sabon dutse, maimakon haka suna rushe "ja ƙasa" da kuma yanayin zafi.[9] Yankunan da ke cikin shimfidar wurare na savanna suna lalacewa ta hanyar ƙaurawar kogin da kuma ambaliyar ruwa a kai a kai wanda ke haifar da wankewa tarar.[9] Sakamakon duka yana raguwa a hankali na wannan farfajiyar. Manyan inselbergs sune polycyclic, amma karamin tor sune siffofi na baya-bayan nan.[9]
Yankin bakin teku Johnson, a shekara ta 1919 Ana ba da shawarar wasu samfuran don bayanan bakin teku: ɗaya don bayanan bakin teku fitowa ɗayan kuma don bayanan bakin Tekun nutsewa. Za'a iya amfani da samfurin da ya dace a bakin teku inda sassa daban-daban zasu iya shiga cikin ruwa da fitowa.
Gishiri Davis, shekara ta 1900 Tsarin yaduwar yaduwar gashi yana hulɗa da yankunan tsaunuka kuma ba shi da tsohuwar mataki tun lokacin da Davis ya yi jayayya cewa babu wani abu da ya fi bunkasa fiye da wuraren da suka manyanta a halin yanzu. Tsarin yaduwar yaduwar gashi ya fara ne da yanayin da ya gabata. A tsawon lokaci, ƙanƙarar kwarin suna lalata dutsen da ke ƙasa a ƙididdiga daban-daban, suna haifar da kwari da ƙanƙara waɗanda suka fi wasu ƙarfi. Yayin da lokaci ke wucewa kankara da ba su da tushe sun kai matakan da suka fi dacewa, tunda zurfin kankara ya lalace, ƙarfin rushewa yana raguwa. A cikin wani mataki na balaga, kwari suna samar da kwari masu santsi.[10]
Karst Cvijić, 1918 Tsarin rushewa a yankunan karst yana da matakai uku. Da farko, sassan saman fashewa suna karyewa, suna faɗaɗa kuma suna cika da ruwa. Kwarin kogi na yau da kullun suna tasowa a saman, ƙananan poljes na iya kasancewa. Daga baya, sake ba da hanya ta ruwa ta hanyar ci gaban tsarin karst ya rushe tsarin ruwa na kogi, tare da kwarin kwarin da ke bunkasa manyan dolines da uvalas. Ridges tsakanin uvalas sannu a hankali ya ɓace yayin da waɗannan yanayin ƙasa suka haɗu. Idan dutsen da ba a iya narkewa ba ya rufe shi, kwarin kogi na yau da kullun zai sake bayyana a hankali da zarar tsarin kogin karkashin kasa ya kai dutsen da bai narkewa. A ƙarshe, duwatsu masu narkewa sun bayyana ne kawai a matsayin tsaunuka masu nisa. Sabanin asalin Davis na rushewa, sake zagayowar karst ba ta ƙare a cikin samar da peneplain.[11]
Tsakanin dusar ƙanƙara Troll, 1948 Peltier, 1950[12][7]
 Tsarin periglacial na rushewa ya fara ne tare da yanayin da ba a yi amfani da shi ba. Da zarar an lalata tarin regolith da ke cikin dusar ƙanƙara yana fallasa dutse a cikin gangaren sama. Sa'an nan kuma an yi amfani da ƙanƙara wanda ke sa gangaren su koma baya suna samar da filayen katako masu yawa a gindin wuraren dutse. A wani mataki na baya, solifluction ya sauka a saman kuma ya cika da ƙananan taswirar ƙasa. [B]

Tarihi

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]
William Morris Davis (1850-1934), mahaliccin samfurin

Tarihi

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Akwai wasu ra'ayoyi game da rushewar cyclical a cikin duniyar Graeco-Roman sannan a cikin duniyar Islama da Turai a lokacin Tsakiyar Tsakiya. Koyaya tasirin William Morris Davis, mahaliccin sake zagayowar tsarin rushewa, sun kasance masu binciken Amurka na ƙarni na 19. Ƙarshen Yaƙin basasar Amurka (1861-1865) ya haifar da ci gaba da binciken yammacin Amurka. Masu bincike uku, John Wesley Powell, Clarence Edward Dutton da Grove Karl Gilbert, sun rubuta game da ilimin ƙasa da ilimin ƙasa a cikin shimfidar wurare da suka haɗu. Daga waɗannan ayyukan ne Davis ya ranta ra'ayoyi da yawa da aka yi amfani da su don gina samfurin.

An yi jayayya cewa ra'ayoyi daga fannin ilmin halitta sun rinjayi Davis, musamman tunanin Neo-Lamarckian wanda yake a yanzu a ƙarshen karni na 19 na Amurka. An yi tunanin cewa Davis ya sami wasu daga cikin wannan tasirin Neo-Lamarckian daga malaminsa, Nathaniel Shaler . Sauran ra'ayoyin halittu waɗanda zasu iya tsara sake zagayowar lalacewa sune na orthogenesis da recapitulation dukansu suna da alaƙa da Neo-Lamarckianism. ka'idar juyin halitta ta Darwin ƙaramar tasiri ce dangane da Neo-Lamarckism. Za'a iya nuna tasirin waɗannan ra'ayoyin a cikin amfani da samfurin na manufar "juyin halitta" maimakon "canji", wanda ke nuna hanyar da za'a iya hangowa game da yanayin wuri da canjin ƙasa.[13] An yi jayayya cewa "Davis da gangan ya yi amfani da Darwinism ga shimfidar wuri".[14]

Godiya da zargi na farko

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Davis ta yi tunanin sake zagayowar tsarin rushewa a cikin shekarun 1880 yayin da take nazarin Appalachians a Pennsylvania da Virginia.[15][14] Davis ya rubuta ka'idar Cycle of erosion dalla-dalla a karo na farko a shekara ta 1889.[14] Ya fi bunkasa a shekara ta 1900 ya sami yabo mai yawa, amma ba a taɓa yarda da shi a duniya ba.[1] An danganta sha'awar farko da ƙarfin sake zagayowar lalacewa ga dalilai daban-daban. Na farko, samfurin ya ba da tsari don nazarin yankuna da lokutan a tarihin Duniya inda rushewa shine babban tsari. Na biyu, samfurin ya dace da babban tunanin juyin halitta wanda ya fito a karni na 19 tare da ka'idar juyin halitta ta Darwin.[16] A ƙarshe, ana iya danganta wasu shahararrun ga salon rubuce-rubucen Davis. Misali ya sami karbuwa mafi girma a cikin shekarun 1900-39 lokacin da aka buga karatu da yawa game da jerin lokuta masu banƙyama bisa ga samfurin. A cikin waɗannan binciken yawanci an gano zagaye biyu zuwa biyar na rushewa. Hanyar yin jerin lokuta tare da sake zagayowar lalacewa ya rasa shahara daga shekarun 1930 zuwa gaba.[16] Wataƙila wannan ya kasance saboda hanyar ba ta samar da wani fahimta ba. Yawancin masu ilimin ƙasa sun fara nazarin hanyoyin da ke faruwa a yanzu kuma ba a baya ba kamar yadda aka yi tare da sake zagayowar tsarin rushewa. Wadannan masu ilimin ƙasa ba da daɗewa ba sun fahimci wasu abubuwan da suka lura sun saba da tsarin Davis. Sauran masu ilimin ƙasa sun juya daga sake zagayowar lalacewa don yin aiki a maimakon haka a kan yanayin yanayi ko ilimin ƙasa.[16]

Misali ya bazu da sauri. A cikin 1901 Hans Reusch yana amfani da shi don bayyana tsaunin da ke kan kudancin Norway.[17][18] Davis Walter Wråk ya yi tasiri sosai don nazarin taimakon tsaunukan Scandinavia na arewa, yana kwatanta da sauran abubuwa da Borsu surface.[19] B. Willis da abokan aiki ne suka buga binciken farko na yanayin kasar Sin ta amfani da samfurin a cikin 1907. [20] An yada ra'ayin sake zagayowar lalacewa tsakanin daliban koleji da jami'a tare da jerin litattafan da aka buga a cikin shekarun 1890 da 1900.[14] A cewar Sheldon Judson har zuwa rahotanni na Yaƙin Duniya na Biyu game da ilimin ƙasa na yanki sun haɗa da taƙaitaccen ambaton sake zagayowar lalacewa da kuma peneplanization.[14]

Duk da yake an fara karɓar samfurin a tsakanin malaman Anglo-Saxon, a cikin nahiyar Turai ya sadu da wasu juriya tare da malaman Jamus Albrecht da Walther Penck, Siegfried Passarge da Alfred Hettner da ke tsaye a matsayin abokan adawar farko ga samfurin. Duk da kokarin Davis, wanda ya hada da fassara aikinsa zuwa Jamusanci, kasancewa farfesa mai ziyara a Berlin da kuma yawon shakatawa da yawa a Turai, sake zagayowar lalacewa bai taba samun tushe mai ƙarfi a Jamus ba.[15] Walther Penck ya samo asali ne daga wani madadin samfurin tare da nasa ka'idoji. Mahaifinsa, Albrecht ne ya buga ra'ayoyin Walther bayan mutuwarsa a 1924. A cikin samfurin Walther, an tsara taimako a matsayin aikin denudation / uplift rate.[15] Davis, abokiyar mahaifin Walther, ya soki sabon samfurin Walther. Binciken Davis game da littafin Walther Penck na biyu a kan batun ya bar ra'ayi mara kyau game da ra'ayoyin Penck tsakanin ma'aikata daga baya. Wannan shi ne saboda Davis bai fahimci ba kuma ya fassara ɓangarorin takarda ba, saboda haka Davis ba isasshen mai sukar aikin Penck ba ne.

A Faransa Albert de Lapparent ne ya fara yada ka'idar lalacewa. Gabaɗaya an haɗa karɓar ta a Faransa tare da Emile Haug yana ba da ɗan hankali ruwa Paul Vidal de La Blache yana karɓar ta ba tare da ajiya ba.[21] Sauran sanannun masana ilimin ƙasa na Faransa waɗanda ra'ayoyin Davis suka rinjayi game da sake zagayowar rushewa sune Emmanuel de Martonne da Henri Baulig . [21] Geomorphology a Faransa ya ci gaba zuwa makarantu biyu, daya ya dogara ne akan masu ilimin ƙasa waɗanda suka karɓi tunanin Davisian kuma wani ya dogara ne da ilimin injiniya tare da haɗin zuwa hydraulics da hakar ma'adinai.[21]

Babban zargi (1945-1974)

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]
Richard Chorley (1927-2002), masanin ilimin ƙasa ne wanda aka sani da sukar da ya yi game da sake zagayowar lalacewa. A cikin kalmomin Cliff Ollier "'Davis bashing' taken ne" a gare shi.[22]

A cikin 1960 masanin ilimin ƙasa Sheldon Judson ya lura cewa masu ilimin ƙasa na Amurka sun fi watsi da manufar kuma sun koma nazarin shimfidar wuri da yanayin ƙasa daga tsari da ra'ayi na kididdiga.[14] Eiju Yatsu ya yi imanin, duk da haka, cewa duk da niyyar da yawancin masana kimiyyar ƙasa suka yi na watsar da ra'ayoyin Davisian bayan Yaƙin Duniya na Biyu, mutane da yawa sun ƙare sun koma gare su tare da wasu gyare-gyare.

Lester Charles King ne ya gabatar da wata ka'idar sake zagayowar a cikin shekarun 1960.[1] Duk da yake ra'ayoyin Sarki sun kasance ƙoƙari na karyata sake zagayowar Davis na lalacewa su kansu sun kasance na yanayin cyclical kuma sun ba da gudummawa ga gabatar da raƙuman zargi a cikin shekarun 1960 a kan duka samfuransa da Davis.[23] Wannan zargi an kira shi "Davis bashing" ta Cliff Ollier kuma ya zama wa Ollier ba'a game da ka'idojin cyclical a cikin ilimin ƙasa ba tare da an gabatar da wani samfurin madadin ba.[23] Tun da yake ra'ayoyin Davis suna lalacewa wasu fannoni na bincike, kamar na yanayin yanayi, an kai musu hari ta hanyar haɗin da suka yi da shi.

An soki ra'ayoyin lokaci, tsawo, gangaren da juyin halitta a fili sake zagayowar rushewa. Bugu da ƙari an yi tambaya game da ingancin wasu ra'ayoyin da ke da alaƙa da sake zagayowar lalacewa ciki har da matakin rafi, raguwar gangara, matakin tushe na D da kuma mafi yawan duk abin da ke cikin peneplains.

[16]Rubuce-rubuce a cikin 1971 masanin ilimin ƙasa Ronald Flemal ya taƙaita halin da ake ciki kamar haka:

Matsayi na zamani

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Despite considerable criticism the cycle of erosion model has remained part of the science of geomorphology.[24] The model or theory has never been proved wrong,[24] but neither has it been proven. The inherent difficulties of the model have instead made geomorphological research to advance along other lines. In contrast to its disputed status in geomorphology, the cycle of erosion model is a common approach used to establish denudation chronologies, and is thus an important concept in the science of historical geology. While acknowledging its shortcomings modern geomorphologists Andrew Goudie and Karna Lidmar-Bergström have praised it for its elegance and pedagogical value respectively.[1] Writing in 2007 Anthony Orme evaluates that:[15]

"an cire kayan juyin halitta, Davisian Cycle of Erosion yana da cancanta a matsayin aikin fassara, kuma hakika har yanzu yana da cancantar a matsayin memba na ƙarshe a cikin abubuwan da za su iya faruwa na lokaci don ci gaban duniya. "

Bayani

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

.mw-parser-output .reflist{margin-bottom:0.5em;list-style-type:decimal}@media screen{.mw-parser-output .reflist{font-size:90%}}.mw-parser-output .reflist .references{font-size:100%;margin-bottom:0;list-style-type:inherit}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns-2{column-width:30em}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns-3{column-width:25em}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns{margin-top:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns ol{margin-top:0}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns li{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .reflist-upper-alpha{list-style-type:upper-alpha}.mw-parser-output .reflist-upper-roman{list-style-type:upper-roman}.mw-parser-output .reflist-lower-alpha{list-style-type:lower-alpha}.mw-parser-output .reflist-lower-greek{list-style-type:lower-greek}.mw-parser-output .reflist-lower-roman{list-style-type:lower-roman}

Manazarta

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]
  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Lidmar-Bergström, Karna. "erosionscykel". Nationalencyklopedin (in Harshen Suwedan). Cydonia Development. Archived from the original on November 14, 2016. Retrieved June 22, 2016. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Naten" defined multiple times with different content
  2. ↑ Ranjan, Priya (2023-03-23). "Davis Cycle of Erosion : Geography Optional". Licchavi Lyceum (in Turanci). Archived from the original on 2023-08-04. Retrieved 2023-09-08.
  3. ↑ Ranjan, Priya (2023-03-23). "Davis Cycle of Erosion : Geography Optional". Licchavi Lyceum (in Turanci). Archived from the original on 2023-08-04. Retrieved 2023-09-08.
  4. ↑ Ranjan, Priya (2023-03-23). "Davis Cycle of Erosion : Geography Optional". Licchavi Lyceum (in Turanci). Archived from the original on 2023-08-04. Retrieved 2023-09-08.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Davis, William M. (1899). "The Geographical Cycle". The Geographical Journal. 14 (5): 481–504. Bibcode:1899GeogJ..14..481D. doi:10.2307/1774538. JSTOR 1774538. Archived from the original on 2020-08-14. Retrieved 2020-06-05. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Davis1899" defined multiple times with different content
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Goudie
  7. ↑ 7.00 7.01 7.02 7.03 7.04 7.05 7.06 7.07 7.08 7.09 Peltier, Louis C. (1950). "The Geographic Cycle in Periglacial Regions as it is Related to Climatic Geomorphology". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 40 (3): 214–236. doi:10.1080/00045605009352070. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Peltier1950" defined multiple times with different content
  8. ↑ Davis, W.M. (1905). "The Geographical Cycle in an Arid Climate". The Journal of Geology. 13 (5): 381–407. Bibcode:1905JG.....13..381D. doi:10.1086/621241. S2CID 129243017. |hdl-access= requires |hdl= (help)
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 Cotton, C.A. (1961). "The Theory of Savanna Planation". Geography. 46 (2): 89–101. JSTOR 40565228. Archived from the original on 2022-10-11. Retrieved 2022-10-11.
  10. ↑ Clifford Embleton. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  11. ↑ Cvijić, Jovan (1918). "Hydrographie souterraine et évolution morphologique du Karst". Recueil des travaux de l'institut de géographie alpine (in Faransanci). 6 (4): 375–426. doi:10.3406/rga.1918.4727.
  12. ↑ Troll, Carl (1948). "Der subnivale oder periglaziale Zyklus der Denudation". Erdkunde (in German). II (1): 1–21. Bibcode:1948Erdk....2....1T. doi:10.3112/erdkunde.1948.01.01.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
  13. ↑ Inkpen, Rob; Collier, Peter (2007). "Neo-Lamarckianism and the Davisian cycle of erosion". Géomorphologie. 13 (2): 113–124. doi:10.4000/geomorphologie.902. Archived from the original on 2020-08-13. Retrieved 2020-06-05.
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5 Judson, Sheldon (1960). "William Morris Davis — an Appraisal". Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie. 4 (13): 193–201. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Zeit1960" defined multiple times with different content
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 Orme, Anthony R. (2007). "The Rise and Fall of the Davisian Cycle of Erosion: Prelude, Fugue, Coda, and Sequel". Physical Geography. 28 (6): 474–506. Bibcode:2007PhGeo..28..474O. doi:10.2747/0272-3646.28.6.474. S2CID 128907423. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Orme2007" defined multiple times with different content
  16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 Flemal, Ronald C. (1971). "The Attack on the Davisian System Of Geomorphology: A Synopsis". Journal of Geological Education. 19 (1): 3–13. Bibcode:1971JGeoE..19....3F. doi:10.5408/0022-1368-XIX.1.3. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Attack" defined multiple times with different content
  17. ↑ Gjessing, Just (1967). "Norway's Paleic Surface". Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift. 21 (2): 69–132. Bibcode:1967NGTid..21...69G. doi:10.1080/00291956708621854.
  18. ↑ Green, Paul F.; Lidmar-Bergström, Karna; Japsen, Peter; Bonow, Johan M.; Chalmers, James A. (2013). "Stratigraphic landscape analysis, thermochronology and the episodic development of elevated, passive continental margins". Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Bulletin. 30: 18. doi:10.34194/geusb.v30.4673.
  19. ↑ Lidmar-Bergströrm, Karna (1996). "Long term morphotectonic evolution in Sweden". Geomorphology. Elsevier. 16 (1): 33–59. Bibcode:1996Geomo..16...33L. doi:10.1016/0169-555X(95)00083-H.
  20. ↑ Lia, Jijun; Ma, Zhenhua; Li, Xiaomiao; Peng, Tingjiang; Guo, Benhong; Zhang, Jun; Song, Chunhui; Liu, Jia; Hui, Zhengchuang; Yu, Hao; Ye, Xiyan; Liu, Shanpin; Wang Xiuxi (2017). "Late Miocene-Pliocene geomorphological evolution of the Xiaoshuizi peneplain in the Maxian Mountains and its tectonic significance for the northeastern Tibetan Plateau". Geomorphology. 295: 393–405. Bibcode:2017Geomo.295..393L. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.07.024.
  21. ↑ 21.0 21.1 21.2 Giusti, Christian (2004). "Géologues et géographes français face à la théorie davisienne (1896-1909) : retour sur "l'intrusion" de la géomorphologie dans la géographie" [On the adoption of the Davisian theory by French geographers and its rejection by geologists (1896-1909): birth of an ideological watershed in the Earth sciences]. Géomorphologie (in French) (3): 241–254. doi:10.3406/morfo.2004.1221.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
  22. ↑ Jorge Rabassa. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  23. ↑ 23.0 23.1 Ollier, Cliff (1995). "Classics in physical geography revisited". Progress in Physical Geography. 19 (3): 371–377. Bibcode:1995PrPG...19..371O. doi:10.1177/030913339501900305. S2CID 128623098.
  24. ↑ 24.0 24.1 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Slaymaker
Daga "https://ha.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tsarin_rushewa&oldid=668661"