Jump to content

Yarjejeniyar Hakki na Musamman na Tarayyar Turai

Daga Wikipedia, Insakulofidiya ta kyauta.
Yarjejeniyar Hakki na Musamman na Tarayyar Turai
treaty of the European Union (en) Fassara, charter (en) Fassara da general principles of European Union law (en) Fassara
Bayanai
Bangare natreaty of the European Union (en) Fassara
LaƙabiListina základních práv Evropské unie
Applies to jurisdiction (en) FassaraTarayyar Turai
Ranar wallafa2000
Harshen aiki ko sunaofficial languages of the European Union (en) Fassara
Work available at URL (en) Fassaraeur-lex.europa.eu…

  Yarjejeniyar Hakki na Tushen Tarayyar Turai (CFR) ta tsarkake wasu hakkoki na siyasa, zamantakewa, da tattalin arziki ga 'Yan ƙasa da mazauna Tarayyar Yuropa (EU) cikin dokar EU. Yarjejeniyar Turai ce ta tsara shi kuma Majalisar Tarayyar Turai, Majalisar Ministoci da Hukumar Tarayyar Tarayyar ta aDisamba 2000. Koyaya, matsayinta na doka a lokacin ba shi da tabbas kuma ba shi da cikakken tasirin doka har sai da Yarjejeniyar Lisbon ta fara aiki a ranar 1 ga Disamba 2009.

Yarjejeniyar ta kasance wani ɓangare na Yankin 'yanci, tsaro da adalci (AFSJ) na EU. Ya shafi dukkan hukumomin Tarayyar Turai da Euratom wanda dole ne ya yi aiki kuma ya tsara doka daidai da tanadinta, saboda Kotunan EU za su soke duk wani doka ko hukuma na EU da aka tantance a matsayin wanda bai dace da Yarjejeniyar ba.

Kasashen membobin EU suma suna da ɗaure ta Yarjejeniyar lokacin da suka shiga aiwatar da Dokar Tarayyar Turai. Koyaya, an ba Poland wani ɓangare na fita daga tilasta CFR duk da shiga cikin AFSJ; akasin haka, Denmark da Ireland sun karɓi Yarjejeniyar, duk da cewa an ba su zaɓi daga AFSJ (janar da ɓangare, bi da bi).

Tarihi

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Yarjejeniyar da ta kafa Kungiyar Tattalin Arziki ta Turai (Yarjejeniyar Roma) ba ta haɗa da wani ambaton asali ko haƙƙin ɗan adam ba. An rubuta Yarjejeniyar EEC 'yan shekaru bayan gazawar Yarjejeniyar Tsaro ta Turai da Yarjejeniyar Siyasa ta Turai. Yarjejeniyar ta ƙarshe ta haɗa da tanadin haƙƙin mallaka kuma Craig da de Búrca suna jayayya cewa, a cikin wannan gazawar, masu tsara Yarjejeniyar EEC suna so su guji duk wani abu na siyasa. Koyaya, ra'ayin cewa ƙarshen tattalin arziki na sabon Yarjejeniyar EEC ba zai yiwu ba ya da wani tasiri ga haƙƙoƙi na asali nan ba da daɗewa ba za a gwada shi.

Shari'o'in kotu

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Ba da daɗewa ba bayan shigar da Yarjejeniyar EEC, Al'umma ta kafa kanta a matsayin babbar ƙungiya ta siyasa tare da tasirin manufofi fiye da manufofinta na tattalin arziki. A shekara ta 1964, Kotun Turai ta yanke hukunci a cikin Costa da ENEL, inda Kotun ta yanke shawarar cewa dokar Tarayyar ya kamata ta fi dacewa da dokar kasa mai rikitarwa. Wannan yana nufin cewa gwamnatocin ƙasa ba za su iya tserewa daga abin da suka amince da shi ba a matakin Turai ta hanyar aiwatar da matakan rikice-rikice na cikin gida, amma kuma yana iya nufin cewa mai ba da doka na EEC na iya yin doka ba tare da cikas ba ta hanyar ƙuntatawa da tanadin haƙƙin asali da aka tsara a cikin kundin tsarin mulkin kasashe membobin. Wannan batun ya zo kan gaba a shekarar 1970 a cikin shari'ar Internationale Handelsgesellschaft lokacin da kotun Jamus ta yanke hukuncin cewa wani bangare na dokar EEC ya keta Dokar Jamusanci. A kan wani bayani daga kotun Jamus, Kotun Kotun Turai ta yanke hukuncin cewa yayin da aikace-aikacen dokar Tarayyar ba zai iya dogara da daidaituwa da kundin tsarin mulki na kasa ba, haƙƙoƙi na asali sun zama "wani ɓangare na ka'idodin ka'idojin [Turai] na Tarayyar Turai" kuma cewa rashin daidaituwa da haƙƙoƙin asali na iya zama tushen ƙalubalen nasara ga dokar Turai.

A cikin mulki kamar yadda ya yi a cikin Internationale Handelsgesellschaft ECJ ta haifar da koyarwar haƙƙin da ba a rubuta ba wanda ya ɗaure cibiyoyin al'umma. Duk da yake cibiyoyin sun amince da ka'idojin haƙƙin haƙƙin haƙƙoƙi na kotun a cikin 1977 kuma an saka wata sanarwa game da hakan a cikin Yarjejeniyar Maastricht. Sai kawai a cikin 1999 ne Majalisar Tarayyar Turai ta fara aiwatar da tsara kundin haƙƙin haƙƙin haƙƙoƙi na EU.

sanarwa

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

A cikin 1999 Majalisar Tarayyar Turai ta ba da shawarar cewa ya kamata a kafa "kungiyar da ta kunshi wakilan shugabannin kasashe da gwamnatoci da shugaban Hukumar da kuma mambobin Majalisar Tarayyaa da majalisun kasa" don tsara kundin haƙƙin haƙƙin haƙƙi.[1] A lokacin da aka kafa shi a watan Disamba na wannan shekarar "jiki" ya kira kansa Yarjejeniyar Turai.

Yarjejeniyar ta amince da daftarin a ranar 2 ga Oktoba 2000 kuma Majalisar Tarayyar Turai, Majalisar Ministoci da Hukumar Tarayyar Tarayyar a ranar 7 ga Disamba 2000. A lokaci guda ne, duk da haka, ya yanke shawarar jinkirta yanke shawara game da matsayin shari'a na Yarjejeniyar. Koyaya, ya zo tare da nauyin siyasa na amincewa da cibiyoyi uku masu ƙarfi kuma saboda haka ECJ ta ambaci shi akai-akai a matsayin tushen haƙƙoƙi na asali.

Ƙarfin Shari'a

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Yarjejeniyar da aka gyara ta kasance wani ɓangare na Kundin Tsarin Mulki na Turai (2004). Bayan gazawar wannan yarjejeniyar, maye gurbinsa, Yarjejeniyar Lisbon (2007), ya kuma ba da ƙarfi ga Yarjejeniyar duk da cewa ta hanyar ambaton ta a matsayin takarda mai zaman kanta maimakon ta hanyar haɗa shi cikin yarjejeniyar kanta. Koyaya, duka sigar da aka haɗa a cikin Kundin Tsarin Mulki da wanda aka ambata a cikin Yarjejeniyar Lisbon an yi gyare-gyare na Yarjejeniyar.

A lokacin da Yarjejeniyar Lisbon ta fara aiki a ranar 1 ga Disamba 2009, Kwamishinan Shari'a Viviane Reding ya ba da shawarar cewa Kwamishinan ya kamata su rantse da tabbatar da duk yarjejeniyar EU da Yarjejeniya. A ranar 3 ga Mayu 2010, Hukumar Tarayyar Turai ta rantse da wata sanarwa a Kotun Tarayyar Tarayyar Tsaro a Luxembourg, ta yi alkawarin girmama Yarjejeniyar Tarayyaa da kuma kasancewa mai zaman kanta gaba ɗaya wajen aiwatar da ayyukansu yayin wa'adin su. A karo na farko, Kwamishinonin sun kuma yi alkawarin a bayyane don girmama sabon Yarjejeniyar Hakki na Musamman.[1]

Jihohi da yawa sun nace kan ficewa daga aikace-aikacen yarjejeniyar ƙasa (duba ƙasa don cikakkun bayanai).

Matsayi na Shari'a

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]
Mataki na 2 na Yarjejeniyar ya tabbatar da haramtacciyar hukuncin kisa a cikin EU.

Bayan shigar da Yarjejeniyar Lisbon a cikin 2009 yarjejeniyar haƙƙin haƙƙin haƙƙi tana da ƙimar doka iri ɗaya da yarjejeniyar Tarayyar Turai. Yarjejeniyar da aka ambata a cikin Yarjejeniyar ita ce gyare-gyare na takardar 2000 wanda cibiyoyin guda uku suka ayyana a rana ɗaya kafin sanya hannu kan Yarjejeniyar Lisbon kanta.

Mataki na 51 (1) na Yarjejeniyar ya yi magana game da Yarjejeniyar ga cibiyoyin EU, hukumomin da aka kafa a karkashin dokar EU kuma, lokacin da ake aiwatar da dokokin EU, kasashe membobin EU. Bugu da kari duka Mataki na 6 na Yarjejeniyar Tarayyar Turai da Mataki na 51 (2) na Yarjejeniya kanta sun hana Yarjejeniyar daga fadada ikon Tarayyar. Sakamakon wannan shi ne cewa Tarayyar Turai ba za ta iya yin doka don tabbatar da haƙƙin da aka tsara a cikin Yarjejeniyar ba sai dai idan an tsara ikon yin hakan a cikin Yarzuwan da suka dace. Bugu da ƙari, mutane ba za su iya ɗaukar memba zuwa kotu ba saboda rashin tabbatar da haƙƙoƙin a cikin Yarjejeniyar sai dai idan memba ɗin da ake magana a kai yana aiwatar da dokar EU. Wannan batu ne na karshe wanda ya kasance batun mafi yawan muhawara

Kalmomin da ke cikin Kremzow da Austria, suna nufin "yankin aikace-aikacen dokar EU", sun bambanta da kalmomin da ke cikin Yarjejeniyar wanda ke nufin aiwatar da dokar EU. Koyaya, yarjejeniyar bayani da aka yi gyare-gyare da aka bayar tare da Yarjejeniyar a cikin 2007 ta bayyana kalmomin da aka yi amfani da su a cikin Yarjejeniyar kamar yadda suke nuna abin da ya faru a ECJ. A cikin 2019, Kotun Tsarin Mulki ta Tarayya Jamus ta kafa a cikin Recht auf Vergessen II cewa tana amfani da Yarjejeniyar a matsayin ma'auni na bita don al'amuran da suka shafi dokar Tarayyar Turai da aiwatarwa ta ƙasa, a ƙarƙashin jigon cewa Yarjejeniyar tana ba da isasshen kariya ga haƙƙoƙin da suka dace idan aka kwatanta da Dokar Tushen Jamhuriyar Tarayyar Jamus. [2] Yarjejeniyar Burtaniya da Poland

  States parties
  States with an opt-out

A cikin tattaunawar da ta kai ga sanya hannu kan Yarjejeniyar Lisbon, Poland da Ingila sun sami yarjejeniya ga yarjejeniyar da ta shafi amfani da Yarjejeniyar Hakki na Musamman a cikin ƙasashensu.

yarjejeniya, a cikin Mataki na 1 (1) ta bayyana cewa "Shari'ar ba ta ba da ikon Kotun Shari'a ta Tarayyar Turai, ko kowane kotun ko kotun Poland ko na Ingila, don gano cewa dokoki, ka'idoji ko tanadin gudanarwa, ayyuka ko ayyuka na Poland ko na Ƙasar Ingila ba su dace da ainihin hakkoki, 'yanci da ka'idojin da ta sake tabbatarwa ba".Mataki na 1 (2) ya ce Title IV na Yarjejeniyar, wanda ya ƙunshi haƙƙin tattalin arziki da zamantakewa, ba ya haifar da haƙƙin adalci, sai dai idan Poland da Burtaniya sun ba da irin waɗannan haƙƙoƙin a cikin dokokin ƙasarsu.

Poland da United Kingdom suna son yarjejeniyar saboda dalilai daban-daban. Ƙasar Ingila da farko ta yi tsayayya da yarjejeniyar doka game da damuwa cewa zai haifar da kwararar 'yan ƙasar Burtaniya da ke zuwa Kotun Shari'a ta Turai a ƙoƙarin tilasta haƙƙin Yarjejeniyar su a Ƙasar Ingila, da kuma karuwar farashi don kasuwanci. Duk da yake Burtaniya ta amince da takardar shaidar haƙƙin doka a lokacin tattaunawar Kundin Tsarin Mulki na Turai da ya gaza, sun tattauna yarjejeniya a lokacin tattaunawarsa ta Lisbon wanda, a cewar Ministan Burtaniya na Turai na lokacin, zai tabbatar da cewa Yarjejeniyar ba za ta faɗaɗa ikon Kotun Turai akan dokar Burtaniya ba. Poland, a gefe guda, ba ta son abin da ta fahimta a matsayin matsayin matsayin mai sassaucin ra'ayi na Yarjejeniyar kan batutuwan zamantakewa, don haka a watan Satumbar 2007 gwamnatin Poland ta nuna cewa suna so a haɗa su cikin yarjejeniyar Burtaniya.

Akwai muhawara mai yawa game da tasirin doka na yarjejeniyar. Ɗaya daga cikin ra'ayoyin, wanda Jan Jirásek ya raba, [3] shine cewa yarjejeniyar ta fita ce wanda ya cire aikace-aikacen Yarjejeniyar zuwa Poland da Ingila. Wani, wanda Ingolf Pernice ya raba, shi ne cewa yarjejeniyar fassara ce kawai wacce za ta sami iyakance ko babu sakamako na doka.[4] Craig da de Burcá suna jayayya cewa yarjejeniyar kawai ta bayyana. Ya ce "Shari'ar ba ta ba da ikon" na ECJ ko wata kotun don soke dokar Burtaniya ko Poland, amma ECJ ta riga ta sami ikon yin hakan a kowane hali. Dangane da haka, Yarjejeniyar "ba za ta iya samun wani tasiri mai mahimmanci a aikace ba".

A cikin NS v Sakataren Cikin Gida, Kotun Kotun Koli ta yanke hukuncin cewa Mataki na 1 (1) na yarjejeniyar "ya bayyana Mataki na 51 na Yarjejeniyar game da girman ta kuma ba ta da niyyar cire Jamhuriyar Poland ko Ingila daga wajibin bin tanadin Yarjejeniyar ko hana kotun ɗaya daga cikin waɗannan Kasashen membobin tabbatar da bin waɗannan tanadi".

A karkashin sashi na 5 (4) na Dokar Tarayyar Turai (Fitarwa) ta 2018, ba a riƙe Yarjejeniyar Hakki na Musamman a cikin dokar Burtaniya ba bayan ficewarta daga EU.

Yarjejeniyar Czech da aka gabatar

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

A lokacin tabbatar da Yarjejeniyar Lisbon, Shugaban Czech Václav Klaus ya nuna damuwa cewa Yarjejeniyar za ta ba da damar iyalai na Jamusawa waɗanda aka kore su daga yankin a Jamhuriyar Czech ta zamani bayan Yaƙin Duniya na Biyu su kalubalanci korar a gaban kotunan EU, kodayake masana shari'a sun ba da shawarar cewa dokokin da aka fitar da Jamusawa, Dokokin Beneš, ba su fada ƙarƙashin ikon dokar EU ba. [5] Bayan Klaus ya ki kammala amincewar Jamhuriyar Czech game da Yarjejeniyar Lisbon sai dai idan an cire kasar daga Yarjejeniyar, kamar yadda Poland da Ingila suka kasance, [6] shugabannin EU sun amince a watan Oktoba na 2009 don gyara yarjejeniyar don hada Jamhuriwar Czech a lokacin yarjejeniyar shiga ta gaba a cikin wani ma'auni da aka tsara don shawo kan Klaus ya sanya hannu kan yarjejeniyar wanda daga baya ya sanya hannu.

A watan Satumbar 2011, gwamnatin Czech ta gabatar da bukatar ga Majalisar cewa a yi gyare-gyaren yarjejeniyar da aka yi alkawari don tsawaita yarjejeniyar ga Jamhuriyar Czech, [7] kuma Majalisar Tarayyar Turai ta gabatar da wani gyare- gyare-gine ga wannan sakamako. [8] Koyaya, Majalisar Dattijai ta Czech ta zartar da ƙuduri a watan Oktoba na shekara ta 2011 da ke adawa da shiga yarjejeniyar.[9] Lokacin da aka sanya hannu kan Yarjejeniyar Kasuwanci ta Croatia ta 2011 a ƙarshen 2011, ba a haɗa gyaran yarjejeniyar Czech ba. A lokacin da majalisa ta Jamhuriyar Czech ta tabbatar da yarjejeniyar shiga a cikin bazara na shekara ta 2012, gwamnati ta yi ƙoƙari ta haɗa amincewar Yarjejeniyar da aka fitar tare da lissafin tabbatarwa. Koyaya, tare da Majalisar Dattijai da jam'iyyun adawa ke sarrafawa, rashin amincewarsu game da fita na iya haifar da ƙin yarjejeniyar shiga. A sakamakon haka, gwamnati ta yanke shawarar raba shirin da aka gabatar daga dokar yarjejeniyar shiga.[10]

Wani kuri'a a kan wani rahoto da Kwamitin Harkokin Tsarin Mulki na Majalisar Tarayyar Turai ya bayar a watan Janairun 2012 wanda ya ba da shawarar kada a ba da bukatar Jamhuriyar Czech da za a kara da ita ga Yarjejeniyar 30 ya haifar da taye.[11] Rahoton ya jaddada cewa Yarjejeniyar 30 ba ta aiki a matsayin babban zaɓi daga Yarjejeniyar, amma kawai ta ba da damar ƙasashe su iyakance aikace-aikacen dokokin EU na gaba bisa ga Yarjejeniyar kawai. Don haka, Jamhuriyar Czech har yanzu za ta kasance a ɗaure ta Yarjejeniyar ko da an kara su a cikin Yarjejeniyar. A watan Oktoba na shekara ta 2012, kwamitin ya amince da rahoton, kuma an buga rubutun na uku na rahoton a ranar 11 ga watan Disamba na shekara ta 2012. [12][13] An gabatar da rahoton a majalisar a lokacin zamanta a ranar 22 ga Mayu 2013, kuma majalisar ta kada kuri'a don neman kira ga Majalisar Tarayyar Turai "kada ta bincika gyaran da aka gabatar na Yarjejeniyar". [8][7] Majalisar, duk da haka, ta ba da yardarta a gaba cewa sake fasalin yarjejeniya don ƙara Jamhuriyar Czech zuwa Yarjejeniyar 30 ba zai buƙaci sabon yarjejeniya ba.[14]

Abun ciki

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]
  • Taken farko (Dignity) yana tabbatar da haƙƙin rayuwa da amincin mutum kuma ya haramta azabtarwa, Bautar, hukuncin kisa, Ayyukan eugenic da kwayar halitta ta mutum. Shirye-shiryen ta galibi sun dogara ne akan ECHR, kodayake Mataki na 1 ya nuna Mataki na farko na Dokar Jamusanci.
  • taron na biyu (Freedoms) ya rufe 'Yanci, sirri, kariya ga Bayanan mutum, aure, tunani, Addini, magana, taro, ilimi, aiki, dukiya da mafaka.
  • Taken na uku (Daidaitawa) ya rufe daidaito a gaban doka, haramta duk nuna bambanci ciki har da tushen nakasa, shekaru da Jima'i, al'adu, addini da bambancin harshe, haƙƙin yara da tsofaffi.
  • Taken na huɗu (Solidarity) ya rufe haƙƙin zamantakewa da ma'aikata ciki har da haƙƙin yanayin aiki mai kyau, kariya daga korarsu da ba ta da adalci, da kuma samun damar kiwon lafiya, taimakon zamantakewa da gidaje, kariya ta muhalli da kariya ta mabukaci.
  • Taken na biyar (Citizen's Rights) ya rufe haƙƙin 'yan ƙasa na EU kamar haƙƙin jefa kuri'a da haƙƙin tsayawa takara a zaɓen Majalisar Tarayyar Turai da zaɓen birni da haƙƙin motsawa cikin EU. Har ila yau, ya haɗa da haƙƙoƙin gudanarwa da yawa kamar haƙƙin gudanarwa mai kyau, don samun dama ga takardu da kuma yin korafi ga Majalisar Tarayyar Turai.
  • Taken na shida (Justice) ya rufe batutuwan Adalci kamar haƙƙin ingantaccen magani, shari'a mai kyau, ga zaton rashin laifi, ka'idar doka, rashin komawa baya da haɗari biyu.
  • Taken na bakwai (Janar tanadi) ya shafi fassarar da aikace-aikacen Yarjejeniyar. Wadannan batutuwan an tattauna su a sama.

Ci gaba da Bayanan Yarjejeniyar

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

A cikin shekara ta 2010, FRA ta fitar da tayin ga mawaƙa don juya Yarjejeniyar zuwa waka mai tsawon minti 80, tare da kiɗa, rawa da abubuwan multimedia. Wannan kuma don wayar da kan jama'a ne da kuma sauƙaƙe rubutun doka zuwa harshe mai fahimta.[15] Koyaya, Viviane Reding, Kwamishinan Turai na Shari'a, 'Yanci da Tsaro, ya rubuta wa darektan FRA yana sukar ra'ayin akan farashi da mutunci kuma yana umurtar shi ya soke aikin.

Dubi kuma

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Manazarta

[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]
  1. ↑ "European Commission swears oath to respect the EU Treaties". Archived from the original on 24 December 2011. Retrieved 21 November 2010.
  2. ↑ First Senate (2019-11-06). "Decisions - The Federal Constitutional Court reviews the domestic application of legislation that is fully harmonised under EU law on the basis of EU fundamental rights***When reviewing claims for injunctive relief against search engine operators, courts must take into account the freedom of expression afforded publishers of online contents". Bundesverfassungsgericht (in Turanci). Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 2020-12-31.
  3. ↑ Jirásek, Jan. "Application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU in the United Kingdom and Poland According to the Lisbon Treaty" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 May 2016. Retrieved 23 January 2010.
  4. ↑ Jaques Missing or empty |title= (help)
  5. ↑ Vaughne Miller (9 November 2009). "The Lisbon Treaty: ratification by the Czech Republic" (PDF). The House of Commons Library. p. 10. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 November 2010. Retrieved 28 January 2010.

    Steve Peers (12 October 2009). "The Beneš Decrees and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights" (PDF). Statewatch. p. 9. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 November 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2009.
  6. ↑ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named "notsign".
  7. 1 2 "European Parliament resolution of 22 May 2013 on the draft protocol on the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to the Czech Republic (Article 48(3) of the Treaty on European Union) (00091/2011 – C7-0385/2011 – 2011/0817(NLE))". 22 May 2013. Archived from the original on 28 August 2019. Retrieved 25 May 2013.
  8. 1 2 "Application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to the Czech Republic. Protocol (amend.)". European Parliament. Archived from the original on 10 May 2013. Retrieved 3 March 2012.
  9. ↑ "SECOND DRAFT REPORT on the draft protocol on the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to the Czech Republic (Article 48(3) of the Treaty on European Union)". European Parliament Committee on Constitutional Affairs. 4 April 2012. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 7 July 2012.
  10. ↑ "Senate unanimously nods to Croatia's EU accession". Prague Daily Monitor. 26 April 2012. Archived from the original on 19 December 2013. Retrieved 3 February 2013.
  11. ↑ "European Union (Croatian Accession and Irish Protocol) Bill". House of Commons Library. 1 November 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 November 2012. Retrieved 31 January 2013.
  12. ↑ "Duff welcomes vote against Czech attack on Charter". Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe. 9 October 2012. Archived from the original on 3 January 2013. Retrieved 31 January 2013.
  13. ↑ "Third draft report – on the draft protocol on the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to the Czech Republic (2011/0817 NLE)". European Parliament. 11 December 2012. Archived from the original on 26 August 2019. Retrieved 19 December 2012.
  14. ↑ "European Parliament decision of 22 May 2013 on the European Council's proposal not to convene a Convention for the addition of a Protocol on the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to the Czech Republic, to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (00091/2011 – C7-0386/2011 – 2011/0818(NLE))". 22 May 2013. Archived from the original on 20 August 2019. Retrieved 25 May 2013.
  15. ↑ "Charter in Poems" (PDF). European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 February 2014. Retrieved 20 February 2014.
Daga "https://ha.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yarjejeniyar_Hakki_na_Musamman_na_Tarayyar_Turai&oldid=920428"