Yarjejeniyar kimiyya
| Bayanai | |
|---|---|
| Ƙaramin ɓangare na |
consensus (en) |
Yarjejeniyar kimiyya ita ce hukunci, matsayi, da ra'ayi na mafi rinjaye ko mafi rinjaye na masana kimiyya a wani bangare na binciken a kowane lokaci.[1][2]
Ana samun yarjejeniya ta hanyar sadarwa ta masana a tarurruka, tsarin bugawa, maimaita sakamakon da wasu za a iya bugawa, muhawara ta masana, [3] [4] da kuma bita na tsara. Taron da aka nufa don ƙirƙirar yarjejeniya ana kiransa taron yarjejeniya.[5][6][7] Irin waɗannan matakan suna haifar da halin da ake ciki wanda waɗanda ke cikin horo zasu iya gane irin wannan yarjejeniya inda yake; duk da haka, sadarwa ga baƙi cewa an cimma yarjejeniya na iya zama da wahala, saboda muhawara "al'ada" ta hanyar da kimiyya ke ci gaba na iya bayyana ga baƙi a matsayin takara.[8] A wani lokaci, cibiyoyin kimiyya suna ba da maganganun matsayi da aka nufa don sadarwa ta taƙaitaccen kimiyya daga "cikin" zuwa "a waje" na al'ummar kimiyya, ko kuma za a iya buga labaran bita na yarjejeniya ko bincike .[9][10] A lokuta inda akwai ɗan jayayya game da batun da ake nazarin, kafa yarjejeniyar na iya zama mai sauƙi.
Shahararren muhawara ta siyasa a kan batutuwan da ke da rikice-rikice a cikin jama'a amma ba lallai ba ne masu rikitarwa a cikin al'ummar kimiyya na iya kiran yarjejeniyar kimiyya: lura da batutuwa kamar juyin halitta, [11] [12] Canjin yanayi, amincin kwayoyin halitta da aka canza, [13] ko rashin alaƙa tsakanin Allurar rigakafin MMR da autism.[8]
Yarjejeniyar kimiyya tana da alaƙa da (kuma wani lokacin ana amfani da ita don ma'ana) shaidar haɗuwa, wato, ra'ayin cewa tushen shaidu masu zaman kansu sun haɗu a kan ƙarshe.[14][15]
Canjin yarjejeniya a tsawon lokaci
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]Akwai ra'ayoyin falsafa da tarihi da yawa game da yadda yarjejeniyar kimiyya ke canzawa a tsawon lokaci. Saboda tarihin canjin kimiyya yana da matukar rikitarwa, kuma saboda akwai halin da ake ciki don tsara "masu cin nasara" da "masu hasara" a baya dangane da yarjejeniyar kimiyya ta yanzu, yana da matukar wahala a samar da daidaitattun samfuran don canjin kimiyya.[16] Wannan ya zama da wahala sosai kuma a wani bangare saboda kowane bangare daban-daban na kimiyya yana aiki a hanyoyi daban-daban tare da nau'ikan shaida daban-daban da hanyoyin gwaji.[17]
Yawancin samfuran canjin kimiyya sun dogara da sabbin bayanai da aka samar ta hanyar gwaji kimiyya. Karl Popper ya ba da shawarar cewa tunda babu yawan gwaje-gwaje da za su iya tabbatar da shi'idar kimiyya, amma gwaji guda ɗaya zai iya karyata ɗaya, kimiyya ya kamata ta dogara da ƙarya. Duk da yake wannan ya samar da ka'idar da ta dace ga kimiyya, a cikin ma'anar "marasa lokaci" kuma ba lallai ba ne ya nuna ra'ayi game da yadda kimiyya ta ci gaba a tsawon lokaci.
Daga cikin masu kalubalantar wannan tsarin shine Thomas Kuhn, wanda ya yi jayayya a maimakon haka cewa bayanan gwaji koyaushe suna ba da wasu bayanai waɗanda ba za su iya shiga gaba ɗaya cikin ka'idar ba, kuma cewa karya kadai bai haifar da canjin kimiyya ko lalata yarjejeniyar kimiyya ba. Ya ba da shawarar cewa yarjejeniyar kimiyya ta yi aiki a cikin nau'ikan "paradigms", waɗanda ra'ayoyin da suka haɗa da juna da kuma tunanin da ke tattare da yanayin ka'idar kanta wanda ya haɗa masu bincike daban-daban a cikin wani filin. Kuhn ya yi jayayya cewa bayan da aka tara "masu muhimmanci" da yawa za a sami yarjejeniyar kimiyya ta shiga lokacin "rikice". A wannan lokacin, za a nemi sabbin ra'ayoyi, kuma a ƙarshe wani tsari zai yi nasara a kan tsohon - jerin canje-canje na tsarin maimakon ci gaba zuwa gaskiya. Misali na Kuhn ya kuma jaddada a bayyane al'amuran zamantakewa da na mutum na canjin ka'idar, yana nunawa ta hanyar Misalai na tarihi cewa yarjejeniyar kimiyya ba ta taɓa zama ainihin batun tunani ko gaskiya ba. Koyaya, waɗannan lokutan kimiyya 'na al'ada' da 'rikice' ba su da alaƙa da juna. Bincike ya nuna cewa waɗannan hanyoyi ne daban-daban na aiki, fiye da lokuta daban-daban.[8]
Manazarta
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]- ↑ Ordway, Denise-Marie (2021-11-23). "Covering scientific consensus: What to avoid and how to get it right". The Journalist's Resource (in Turanci). Retrieved 2022-09-11.
- ↑ "Scientific Consensus". Green Facts. Retrieved October 24, 2016.
- ↑ Ford, Michael (2008). "Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning" (PDF). Science Education. 92 (3): 409. Bibcode:2008SciEd..92..404F. doi:10.1002/sce.20263.
Construction of scientific knowledge is first of all public, a collaborative effort among a community of peers working in a particular area. 'Collaborative' may seem a misnomer because individual scientists compete with each other in their debates about new knowledge claims. Yet this sense of collaboration is important: it checks individual scientists from being given authority for new knowledge claims prematurely.
- ↑ Webster, Gregory D. (2009). "The person-situation interaction is increasingly outpacing the person-situation debate in the scientific literature: A 30-year analysis of publication trends, 1978-2007". Journal of Research in Personality. 43 (2): 278–279. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.030.
- ↑ Przepiorka, D.; Weisdorf, D.; Martin, P.; Klingemann, H. G.; Beatty, P.; Hows, J.; Thomas, E. D. (June 1995). "1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading". Bone Marrow Transplantation. 15 (6): 825–828. ISSN 0268-3369. PMID 7581076.
- ↑ Jennette, J. C.; Falk, R. J.; Bacon, P. A.; Basu, N.; Cid, M. C.; Ferrario, F.; Flores-Suarez, L. F.; Gross, W. L.; Guillevin, L.; Hagen, E. C.; Hoffman, G. S.; Jayne, D. R.; Kallenberg, C. G.; Lamprecht, P.; Langford, C. A. (2013). "2012 revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides". Arthritis and Rheumatism (in Turanci). 65 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1002/art.37715. ISSN 0004-3591. PMID 23045170.
- ↑ Antzelevitch, Charles; Brugada, Pedro; Borggrefe, Martin; Brugada, Josep; Brugada, Ramon; Corrado, Domenico; Gussak, Ihor; LeMarec, Herve; Nademanee, Koonlawee; Perez Riera, Andres Ricardo; Shimizu, Wataru; Schulze-Bahr, Eric; Tan, Hanno; Wilde, Arthur (8 February 2005). "Brugada syndrome: report of the second consensus conference: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society and the European Heart Rhythm Association". Circulation. 111 (5): 659–670. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000152479.54298.51. ISSN 1524-4539. PMID 15655131.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 Shwed Uri; Peter Bearman (December 2010). "The Temporal Structure of Scientific Consensus Formation". American Sociological Review. 75 (6): 817–40. doi:10.1177/0003122410388488. PMC 3163460. PMID 21886269.
- ↑ Anderegg, William R. L.; Prall, James W.; Harold, Jacob; Schneider, Stephen H. (2010-06-07). "Expert credibility in climate change". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (in Turanci). 107 (27): 12107–12109. Bibcode:2010PNAS..10712107A. doi:10.1073/pnas.1003187107. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 2901439. PMID 20566872.
- ↑ Cook, John; Oreskes, Naomi; Doran, Peter T.; Anderegg, William R. L.; Verheggen, Bart; Maibach, Ed W.; Carlton, J. Stuart; Lewandowsky, Stephan; Skuce, Andrew G.; Green, Sarah A.; Nuccitelli, Dana (April 2016). "Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming". Environmental Research Letters (in Turanci). 11 (4): 048002. Bibcode:2016ERL....11d8002C. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 470384.
|hdl-access=requires|hdl=(help) - ↑ "Statement on the Teaching of Evolution" (PDF). American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2006-02-16. Retrieved 2008-05-02.
- ↑ "NSTA Position Statement: The Teaching of Evolution". National Science Teacher Association. Archived from the original on 2012-03-20. Retrieved 2008-05-02.
- ↑ Nicolia, Allesandro; Manzo, Alberto; Veronesi, Fabio; Rosellini, Daniele (2013). "An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research". Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 34 (1): 77–88. doi:10.3109/07388551.2013.823595. PMID 24041244. S2CID 9836802.
- ↑ Thorp, H. Holden (2025-04-25). "Convergence and consensus". Science (in Turanci). 388 (6745): 339. doi:10.1126/science.ady3211. ISSN 0036-8075.
- ↑ "Explainer: Scientific Consensus". Skeptical Science. Retrieved 2025-05-02.
- ↑ Empty citation (help)
- ↑ Kerr, John R.; Wilson, Marc Stewart (2018-07-06). "Changes in perceived scientific consensus shift beliefs about climate change and GM food safety". PLOS ONE (in Turanci). 13 (7): e0200295. Bibcode:2018PLoSO..1300295K. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200295. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 6034897. PMID 29979762.