Haƙƙin samun ingantaccen magani

Daga Wikipedia, Insakulofidiya ta kyauta.
Haƙƙin samun ingantaccen magani
Hakkokin Yan-adam
Bayanai
Bangare na Gamayyar Sanarwa na Yancin Dan'adam
Farawa 10 Disamba 1948
Depicted by (en) Fassara Gamayyar Sanarwa na Yancin Dan'adam
Mandates (en) Fassara legal remedy (en) Fassara

Haƙƙin samun ingantaccen magani shine haƙƙin mutumin da aka tauye haƙƙin ɗan adam don gyara doka . Dole ne irin wannan maganin ya kasance mai isa, mai ɗaurewa, mai ikon gabatar da masu laifi a gaban shari'a, ba da lada mai dacewa, da kuma hana ci gaba da keta haƙƙin mutum.[1][2][3][4] Haƙƙin samun ingantaccen magani yana tabbatar wa mutum ikon neman magani daga jihar kai tsaye maimakon ta hanyar ƙasa da ƙasa. Hanya ce ta zahiri ta kare haƙƙin ɗan adam a matakin jiha kuma tana buƙatar ƙasa ba wai kawai ta kare haƙƙin ɗan adam ba har ma a aikace kan shari'o'i guda ɗaya.[3][5][6][7] Haƙƙin samun ingantaccen magani ana yarda da shi azaman haƙƙin ɗan adam a cikin dokokin haƙƙin ɗan adam na duniya.[8][9][10]

An bayyana haƙƙin samun ingantaccen magani a cikin Mataki na 8 na Yarjejeniya ta Duniya kan Haƙƙin Dan Adam, Mataki na 2 na Yarjejeniya Ta Duniya Kan 'Yancin Bil Adama da Siyasa, Mataki na 13 na Yarjejeniyar Turai Kan Haƙƙin Dan Adam, da Mataki na 47 na Yarjejeniya Ta Tarayyar Turai Muhimman Hakkoki .

Masu neman mafaka[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

An yi amfani da haƙƙin samun ingantaccen magani a cikin shari'o'in masu neman mafaka inda aka riƙe haƙƙin don hana wata jiha daga korar mai neman mafaka kafin yanke hukunci game da neman mafaka, da kuma cewa idan an ƙi neman mafaka, mai da'awar dole ne. suna da ikon ɗaukaka ƙara ta hanyar ba da isasshen lokaci da damar samun wakilcin doka.[11] Kotu ba gaba daya sun gano cewa jihar na bukatar samar da lauya, ko da mai neman mafaka ba zai iya ba, muddin lauya bai zama dole don samun wani ingantaccen magani ba. Kotuna sun gano cewa tsarin da ya wuce kima na iya keta haƙƙin samun ingantaccen magani, musamman idan ba a ba da lauya ba. [11]

Tarayyar Turai[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

A cikin dokar Tarayyar Turai, haƙƙin samun ingantaccen magani yana aiki fiye da haƙƙin ɗan adam ga duk haƙƙoƙin da dokar EU ta tanadar waɗanda ake aiwatar da su a kotunan ƙasashe membobi.[12]

Azaba[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

Kwamitin Kare Hakkokin Dan Adam na Majalisar Dinkin Duniya ya bayyana cewa, a lokuta da ake azabtarwa, 'yancin samun ingantaccen magani yana bukatar jihohi su binciki zargin azabtarwa, gurfanar da wadanda suka aikata laifin, bayar da diyya ga wadanda abin ya shafa, da kuma hana aikata irin wannan cin zarafi daga sake faruwa.[13] An bayyana ƙa'idar 'yancin samun ingantaccen magani a cikin sashi na 14 na Yarjejeniyar Majalisar Dinkin Duniya game da azabtarwa .

Nassoshi[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]

  1. ↑ "Right to an effective remedy". ag.gov.au. Australian Government: Attorney-General's department. Retrieved 8 June 2018.
  2. ↑ "What is the right to an effective remedy? | Icelandic Human Rights Centre". Icelandic Human Rights Centre (in Turanci). Retrieved 2018-06-08.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Kuijer, Martin (29 April 2014). "EFFECTIVE REMEDIES AS A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT" (PDF). Escuela Judicial Española & European Judicial Training Network. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 14 May 2023.
  4. ↑ The Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Gross Human Rights Violations A Practitioners' Guide Revised Edition, 2018 (PDF). International Commission of Jurists. 2018. ISBN 978-92-9037-257-8.
  5. ↑ Musila, Godfrey (2006-12-20). "The Right to an Effective Remedy Under the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights" (in Turanci). Rochester, NY. SSRN 2425592. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  6. ↑ "The right to effective remedy" (PDF). universal-rights.org. February 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 January 2023. Retrieved 8 June 2018.
  7. ↑ Gutman, Kathleen (2019-09-04). "The Essence of the Fundamental Right to an Effective Remedy and to a Fair Trial in the Case-Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union: The Best Is Yet to Come?". German Law Journal (in Turanci). 20 (6): 884–903. doi:10.1017/glj.2019.67. ISSN 2071-8322.
  8. ↑ Musila, Godfrey (2006-12-20). "The Right to an Effective Remedy Under the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights" (in Turanci). Rochester, NY. SSRN 2425592. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  9. ↑ "The right to effective remedy" (PDF). universal-rights.org. February 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 January 2023. Retrieved 8 June 2018.
  10. ↑ Gutman, Kathleen (2019-09-04). "The Essence of the Fundamental Right to an Effective Remedy and to a Fair Trial in the Case-Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union: The Best Is Yet to Come?". German Law Journal (in Turanci). 20 (6): 884–903. doi:10.1017/glj.2019.67. ISSN 2071-8322.
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 Reneman, Marcelle (2008-09-24). "Access to an Effective Remedy in European Asylum Procedures". Amsterdam Law Forum (in Turanci). 1 (1): 65–98. doi:10.37974/ALF.38. ISSN 1876-8156.
  12. ↑ Hofmann, Herwig C.H. (2013). "The Right to an 'Effective Judicial Remedy' and the Changing Conditions of Implementing EU Law". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2292542. ISSN 1556-5068.
  13. ↑ McCall-Smith, Kasey (3 February 2022). "How Torture and National Security Have Corrupted the Right to Fair Trial in the 9/11 Military Commissions". Journal of Conflict & Security Law. 27 (1): 83–116. doi:10.1093/jcsl/krac002.
Daga "https://ha.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Haƙƙin_samun_ingantaccen_magani&oldid=329231"