Yunkurin kare hakkin iyaye Maza a Amurka
![]() | |
---|---|
Yunkurin kare hakkin iyaye ta ƙasa | |
Bayanai | |
Ƙasa | Tarayyar Amurka |
Ƙungiyar kare hakkin iyaye a Amurka ƙungiya ce da ke ba iyaye Maza tallafin ilimi,da tallafin da bayar da shawarwari kan al'amurran da suka shafi tsarin kula da yara, samun dama, tallafin yara, cin zarafin gida da cin zarafin yara . Membobin sun nuna rashin amincewarsu da abin da suke gani a matsayin shaida na nuna son kai ga iyaye maza a rassa da sassan gwamnatoci daban-daban, ciki har da kotunan iyali .
Yunkurin ya samo asali ne daga kisan aure da rigingimu a cikin shekarun 1960. A yau, ƙungiyar kare haƙƙin ubanni na zamani gabaɗaya tana mai da hankali kan batutuwan da suka shafi tarbiyyar yara tare da ba da tallafi da wayar da kan jama'a ga iyaye da ƴaƴa bayan rabuwa ko rabuwa.
Ƙungiyoyin yancin uba daban-daban kuma na iya bayar da shawarwari kan haƙƙin uban da ba su yi aure ba ta hanyar ƙoƙarce-ƙoƙarce ko kafofin watsa labarai. Sauran batutuwan shawarwari sun haɗa da nuna bambanci tsakanin jinsi, a al'ada da kuma daga cikin tsarin shari'a, ziyara, tallafi, kiyaye ƙofa na uwa da kuma nisantar iyaye .
Tarihi
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]Ƙungiyoyin 'yancin ubanni na zamani a Amurka sun fito ne tare da kafa Racket Busters na kisan aure a California a 1960 don nuna rashin amincewa da dokokin kisan aure na California, wanda suka yi iƙirarin nuna wariya ga mazaje a cikin abinci, wuraren tallafi na yara da kuma a cikin tsammanin kulawar iyaye. Kungiyar ta fadada zuwa wasu jihohi, inda ta canza suna zuwa Sake Gyaran aure a 1961. Tare da karuwar adadin kisan aure a cikin 1960s da 1970s, ƙarin ƙungiyoyin maza na gida na gida sun taso don sake fasalin kisan aure, kuma a cikin 1980s, akwai jimillar ƙungiyoyin haƙƙin ubanni fiye da 200 da ke aiki a kusan kowace jiha. Wadannan kungiyoyi sun mayar da hankali kan ayyukansu kan abin da suke kallo a matsayin nuna wariyar jinsi a cikin dokar iyali ta hanyar shiga cikin harkokin siyasa kamar su zage-zage na majalisun dokoki na jihohi, shigar da kararrakin aji, daukar kotuna, da sa ido kan hukunce-hukuncen alkalai ta hanyar “kallon kotu”. A shekarun 1990s sun ga bullar sabbin kungiyoyi masu girma kamar su Initiative na Uban kasa da Ƙungiyar Ƙungiyoyin Uban Amirka. An yi ƙoƙari da dama da bai yi nasara ba don kafa ƙungiyar ƙasa wacce ƙungiyoyin gida za su kasance a cikinta. Sakamakon haka, motsin ya kasance mafi yawan saɓanin haɗin gwiwa na ƙungiyoyin gida.
Batutuwa
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]Ra'ayin jinsi
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]
Raba tarbiyya
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]Ziyara
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]Mai kula da kofa
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]Nisantar iyaye
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]Tallafawa
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]Zamba da zamba
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]- Alimony Racket
- Wasan Badger
- Raket balm
- Ha'incin uba
Dokokin tarayya
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]Kotun Koli ta Amurka
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]Wasu jihohin sun cire hukuncin kisan aure, renon yara da tallafin yara daga kotuna na gama gari tare da sanya su kotunan adalci. Michael Newdow ya yi iƙirarin cewa mafi kyawun ƙimar ƙa'idar yara, kamar yadda kotunan iyali ke amfani da su a halin yanzu, ya keta ka'idar kariyar daidaitaccen tsarin tsarin mulkin Amurka . [1]
Bradley Gyara
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]Domin yawan kudaden da gwamnatin tarayya ta baiwa jihohi ya dogara ne akan adadin tallafin da jihar ta tara, mambobin kungiyar kare hakkin ubanni sun yi zargin cewa dokar tarayya (Title IV-D na Dokar Tsaron Jama'a) ta hana dokokin samar da wani zato na raba. tarbiyyar yara . [2]
Masu fafutukar kare hakkin iyaye sun yi iƙirarin cewa ma’aikatan Hukumar Kula da Ayyukan Jama’a ta Massachusetts (DSS) sun cire yara daga iyayensu ba tare da dalili ba. [3] Sun ƙara da cewa waɗannan ma'aikatan sun sami kariya ta hanyar da ba ta dace ba daga Kotun Koli ta Massachusetts, [4] sun yi barazana ga iyaye mata tare da asarar 'ya'yansu don tilasta su zuwa saki [5] da kuma halartar kungiyoyin tallafi. [6] Sun yi iƙirarin cewa waɗannan ƙungiyoyin tallafi sun yi aiki biyu ne na baiwa abokan hulɗar ma’aikatan DSS damar samun tallafin gwamnati don tafiyar da ƙungiyoyin tallafi, da baiwa ma’aikatan DSS damar samun bayanan da ake amfani da su wajen cire yara. [6]
Abokan adawar mata a zaman majalisa sun yi zargin cin zarafi da barazanar cutar da masu ba da shawara, yayin da mambobin suka bayyana cewa kungiyar mata ta kasa da sauran su ta yiwu sun kirkiro da'awar don samun kulawa a wani bangare na shirin sanya iyayen da ba su kula da su a matsayin masu tsattsauran ra'ayi ba. . [7]
Dokokin Jiha
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]South Dakota
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]A South Dakota, an sanya hannu kan dokar Majalisar Dattawa 74 a ranar 11 ga Maris, 2014 [8]
Illinois
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]A cikin Illinois, an sanya hannu kan waɗannan dokoki tare da Jeffery M. Leving a cikin 2009:
SB 1628, wanda Sanata Iris Martinez ya dauki nauyin kuma a cikin Majalisa ta Wakilci Deborah Mell, ya cika abubuwa biyu: Ya gyara Dokar Uba da sauran Ayyuka don tabbatar da cewa an sanar da bangarorin biyu hakkinsu na gwajin DNA kafin a iya yanke hukunci ko dai ta hanyar uba. yarda na son rai, shari'ar kotu ko ta hanyar alkali na shari'a. Haka kuma ta yi gyara ga sashin tsoma bakin ziyara na kundin laifuffuka tare da sanya shi zama laifi don hana sauran iyayen hakkinsu na lokacin haihuwa ko lokacin tsare su. A baya can, tsoma baki kawai laifi ne. (An sanya hannu kan doka: Agusta 11, 2009)
SB 1590, wanda Sen. Pamela Althoff ya dauki nauyinsa kuma a cikin House ta Wakilai Sandra Pihos, kuma wanda ya wuce gaba ɗaya, yana ba yara da iyayen da ba su kula da su damar yin amfani da fasahar ziyarta ta lantarki kamar imel, tarho, intanet da taron bidiyo. Illinois ta zama jiha ta shida da ta zartar da Dokokin Ziyarar Hannu wanda zai iya ba da damar ziyartar ubanni da ke kurkuku. (An sanya hannu kan doka: Agusta 11, 2009)
HB 4008, wanda Majalisar Dattijai ta dauki nauyin Sanata Martinez da Rep. Jehan Gordon, sun haɗa da tanadi na uba na SB 1628. Ta yi gyara ga dokar uba don tabbatar da cewa za a sanar da bangarorin biyu a sarari game da haƙƙinsu na gwajin DNA kafin a sanya hannu na son rai na uba ko kuma a shigar da odar haihuwa. (An sanya hannu kan doka: Agusta 14, 2009)
HB 2266, wanda Martinez da Wakili Ken Dunkin suka ɗauki nauyin, sun gyara sashin kutsawa na ziyara na Dokar Laifuka tare da amfani da kalmomin da aka yi amfani da su a cikin shari'ar iyali a yau (watau lokacin haihuwa da lokacin kulawa). (An sanya hannu kan doka: Agusta 25, 2009)
Massachusetts
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]Mai bincike na shari'a, Zed McLarnon, ya tabbatar da cewa kotunan dangin Massachusetts sun yi amfani da kimantawa na asibiti na fatalwa da aka adana a cikin fayilolin ɓoye, sauraron sauraron sirri ba tare da kasancewar iyayen biyu ba, da likitan kaset na sauraron kotu. [9] Wani mai fafutukar kare hakkin uba ya daukaka kara zuwa ga wani dan majalisar dokokin jihar Massachusetts wanda ya rubuta wata dokar muhalli (mai suna Anti-Slapp) da nufin kare masu fallasa su daga hukumcin hukumci da hukumomi ke yi da kuma wanda Kotun Koli ta Massachusetts ta sake rubutawa don yi wa iyaye mata da ma'aikatan jin dadin jama'a rigakafi wadanda suka shigar da kararrakin karya, lura da cewa ubanni kusan ba su da maganin zarge-zargen karya. [10]
A cikin 2004, an ba wa wasu masu jefa ƙuri'a na Massachusetts damar jefa ƙuri'a a kan tambayar da ba ta dauri ba game da ƙirƙirar zato na doka don tsare jiki na haɗin gwiwa. Daya daga cikin irin wannan tambayar ita ce, "Shin za a umurci wakilin jihar daga wannan gunduma ya kada kuri'ar amincewa da dokar da ke bukatar cewa a duk shari'ar raba aure da kisan aure da ya shafi kananan yara, kotu za ta bi muhimman hakkokin iyaye biyu na hakki na zahiri da na shari'a. 'ya'yansu da 'ya'yan 'ya'yansu don kara yawan lokacinsu tare da kowane iyaye, har zuwa yadda ake amfani da su, sai dai idan iyaye ɗaya ba su dace ba ko kuma iyayen sun yarda da wani abu, dangane da bukatun da ake bukata na tallafin yara da dokokin rigakafin cin zarafi?" Daga cikin masu jefa kuri'a da ke zabar amsa abubuwan da ke sama ko makamantansu na shirin kada kuri'a, kashi 84.5% sun amince.
Wisconsin
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]Masu fafutukar kare hakkin uba sun yi kamfen don sauya dokar Wisconsin, wacce ta ba wa iyayen da ke riko damar yin tafiyar 150 miles (240 km) nesa da mazauninsu na baya ba tare da sanar da iyayen da ba su kula da su ba, don ƙirƙirar zato wanda za'a iya warwarewa wanda ya wuce 20 miles (32 km) ba su da amfani ga yara. [11]
Fadakarwa
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]- Ƙungiyar Haƙƙin Uba - Ƙungiya mai zaman kanta ( Yanar Gizo da Facebook ) wanda Thomas Fidler ya kafa a cikin 2011 don ba da shawara ga Gyara Dokar Iyali, Daidaita 50/50 na Iyaye na Iyaye da Laifin Zarge-zargen Karya na Rikicin Cikin Gida, da kuma yada wayar da kan jama'a. Dabaru daban-daban da aka yi amfani da su a Kotunan Iyali na yau da kuma nuna bambanci ga maza a cikin shari'ar da ake tsare da su.
- Lansing zuwa Washington DC Bike Trek Don Daidaita Iyaye - A watan Agusta 2007, Robert Pedersen da Rob MacKenzie sun yi Capitol zuwa Capitol Bike Trek don Iyaye Daidai. Wannan ita ce balaguron shekara ta uku na MacKenzie. [12] [13] Sun bayyana a Studio 1714. [14] [15] An ba su lambar yabo ta musamman ta Jihar Michigan. [16]
- Zanga-zangar a Lincoln Memorial - A ranar Juma'a, 18 ga Agusta, 2007, [17] Jolly Stanesby da Mike Downes na Burtaniya sun haura mutum-mutumin Lincoln a wurin tunawa da Lincoln, sun bayyana kayan kyaftin Amurka da Batman, kuma sun sanya tuta a kan kirjin Lincoln suna karantawa " Ga Uban Al'umma 4 Adalci ". Uba 4 Justice ya nuna cewa sun yi niyyar ƙarin zanga-zangar nan gaba. [18]
- Rally na Ranar Tsare Iyali -- Masu fafutukar kare hakkin Iyali da Iyaye sun gudanar da taron kasa a Washington DC ranar Asabar 18 ga Agusta, 2007. [19] Masu ba da shawara a fili sun kwatanta motsin su da ƙungiyoyin kare hakkin jama'a, kuma sun nuna hukunce-hukuncen Kotun Koli da aka dade ana yi cewa iyaye suna da hakkin kula da 'ya'yansu, na baya-bayan nan shine Troxel v. Granville . Masu jawabai sun hada da Alkali Willie Lipscomb Babban Alkali na 36th District Court Detroit, Michigan, [20] Tim McKyer, [21] Dr. OJ Shabazz, Evangelist Harlem Church of Christ, New York, NY. da [22] Carol Rhodes - Tsohon Michigan FOC (Abokin Kotun) Jami'in tilastawa, Mawallafin Abokin Kotun Maƙiyin Iyali [23] Ta bayyana cewa "Iyalan da ke zubar da jini daga zafin kisan aure da rabuwa an zagi, yaudara, yaudara., ƙarya da yaudara da mutane ba tare da isasshen horo ba ". [24]
- Barry County Equal Parenting Symposium -- Wannan taron ya gudana a watan Yuni 2007. Carol Rhodes, Mawallafin "Abokin Kotun Maƙiyin Iyali", ya bayyana cewa a matsayinta na Abokiyar ma'aikacin Kotun, an umurce ta da ta keta doka kuma ta yi ƙarya ga iyaye maza da mata. [25] Jay Fedewa, Babban Daraktan Haɗin gwiwar Haƙƙin Iyali, ya tattauna matsayin dokar iyali ta Michigan. [26] Lary Holland ya yi iƙirarin cewa Tallafin Tallafin IV-D na Tarayya yana hana haɓakar iyaye daidai. [27] Ya yi bayanin cewa tallafin Title IV-D ya haifar da kwarin gwiwa na kudi ga Abokin Kotu na Michigan da sauran hukumomin tallafawa yara na jihohi don haifar da matsaloli tsakanin iyaye, haifar da aiwatar da aiwatar da ayyukan da zasu iya tara dalar tarayya. [28] Holland ya ba da shawarar sake fasalin taken IV-D, gami da buƙatun cancantar samun kuɗin shiga don mayar da hankali kan tarin tallafin yara kan yara masu karamin karfi waɗanda ya ce ana “ nutsar da su” ta hanyar mai da hankali kan tarawa ga iyalai masu tsaka-tsaki da masu samun kuɗi. Ya kara da cewa, batun samar da kudade ya kasance wani muhimmin al’amari na hana ‘yan majalisar dokoki na jihohi aiwatar da kudirin dokar kula da tarbiyyar yara. Wakilan Michigan Glen Steil, [29] Rick Jones [30] da Fulton Sheen [31] sun ba da shawarar daidaita iyaye. Robert Pedersen ya tattauna tarbiyya daidai gwargwado da tafiya ta keke don tarbiyya daidai gwargwado. [32]
Shawara
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]- Barb Johnson - Barb Johnson, mai gabatar da kara kuma memba na kungiyar hakkin ubanni, bai yi nasara ba ya tsaya takarar gwamnan Massachusetts a shekara ta 2002 a kan wani dandali na sake fasalin kotu, da bukatar yin lissafin shari'a - musamman a kotunan dokokin iyali da kuma soke kariya na shari'a da na shari'a. Daga baya an kore ta saboda abin da ta bayyana a matsayin dalilai na siyasa da kuma ilimantar da iyaye game da kima da bai dace ba na kuɗaɗen kula da alkalan kotun dangi na Massachusetts. Ta yi ƙoƙarin ƙirƙirar lissafin shari'a da soke kariya ta shari'a ta hanyar karar da ta yi a kan Hukumar Kula da Lauyoyin Massachusetts et al. don ayyukan batanci da tsangwama da gangan tare da kyakkyawar alaƙar kasuwanci mai alaƙa da rushewar ta. A shekara ta 2009, ta buga wani littafi mai tsegumi—Bayan Baƙar Robe: Failed Justice—wanda ke ɗauke da labaran da ke nuna wasu dabaru da tarko na kotuna ga ɓangarorin da ba su da hankali suna fafutukar samun adalci. [33] [34]
- John Murtari -- An kama John Murtari akai-akai saboda yin cauling "Ina son Dom. Sanata Clinton Don Allah a Taimake Mu" da kuma irin wadannan sakonni a bakin titin Hanley Federal Building a Syracuse, NY. [35] Murtari ya yi ƙoƙari na tsawon shekaru bai yi nasara ba don ganawa da Sanata Hillary Clinton, wadda ta kula da ofisoshi a Ginin. A baya dai ya gudanar da yajin cin abinci na tsawon watanni 6 a gidan yari.
Bayanan watsa labarai
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]Membobin kungiyar kare hakkin ubanni sun soki labarin jaridar New York Times Sunday Magazine ta shekara ta 2005 wadda ta fara da kalmomin, “…yanke shawarar tsarewa bisa al'ada bisa abin da ke 'mafi amfani ga yaro.' Amma wasu ubanni yanzu suna jayayya - kuma suna tayar da hankali - don haƙƙoƙin haƙƙin kansu da bukatun kansu,” don ƙirƙirar rarrabuwar kawuna tsakanin maslahar yara da yancin uba. [36]
Game da wani shirin shirye-shiryen Watsa Labarai na Jama'a (PBS) game da yara da kisan aure, yana mai cewa mambobin sun yi sharhi cewa ba kamar wani shirin PBS na baya ba, wasan kwaikwayon ya daidaita, amma ya nuna motsi a matsayin inganta rikici, ya kara da cewa matsakaicin mai kallo bai bambanta rikici a cikin jama'a ba. daga rikici a cikin gida, wanda zai iya cutar da yara. [37]
Mambobin sun kuma nuna rashin amincewarsu da wani labarin Boston Globe game da shari'ar da wani uba ya yi nasarar hana wata uwa motsa yara mai nisan mil 70 zuwa wata jiha. A cewar masu fafutukar, labarin bai dace ba ya alakanta ra’ayoyin yaran da cewa ba za su iya zama tare da mahaifiyarsu ba da kuma tsarin tarbiyyar da aka raba maimakon a raba aurensu, inda suka kara da cewa dan jaridan ya tambayi yaran kan halin da suke ciki don haka ya kara ta’azzara rikicin. ji da yara.
Duba Sauran bayanai
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]- Kungiyar kare hakkin uba
- Yunkurin yancin iyaye ta ƙasa
- Rijista uba
- Yarjejeniyar Majalisar Dinkin Duniya kan Hakkokin Yara
Manazarta
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]- ↑ Newdow, Michael (2004-06-18). "Family Feud". Slate.Com. Retrieved 2007-04-30.
- ↑ Rogers, R. Mark. "ACFC presentation". American Coalition of Fathers and Children. Archived from the original (video) on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
- ↑ Hession, Gregory (2003-01-06). "DSS Dirty Tricks Series". MassOutrage.Com. Archived from the original on 2007-04-12. Retrieved 2007-04-27.
- ↑ Baskerville, Stephen (2004-06-06). "MASSACHUSETTS' FAMILY 'JUSTICE'". NewsWithViews.com. Retrieved 2007-05-07.
- ↑ Baskerville, Stephen (Summer 2003). "Divorce as Revolution". The Fatherhood Coalition, also Salisbury Review vol. 21 no. 4. Archived from the original on 2007-04-03. Retrieved 2007-03-22.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Moore, Nev (2003-07-29). "Inside A 'Batterers Program' for 'Abused' Women". The Fatherhood Coalition. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-04-17.
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedCustody Bill Turns Frightful
- ↑ "SB 74 provide for the consideration of joint physical custody of a minor". Archived from the original on 14 March 2014. Retrieved 2021-12-28.
- ↑ McLarnon, Zed (2002). "Judicial Bias(?) - How It Works and How To Defend Against It". EJFI.Org. Retrieved 2007-04-26.
- ↑ Del Gallo III Esq., Rinaldo (2006-02-22). "Anti-SLAPP Abuse In Massachusetts". FathersUnite.Org. Retrieved 2006-05-16.
- ↑ Jeffery Leving; Glenn Sacks (2005-06-17). "AB 400 Will Help Wisconsin's Children of Divorce". Glenn Sacks. Archived from the original on 2007-02-10. Retrieved 2007-05-12.
- ↑ "Lansing to Washington D.C. Bike Trek for Equal Parenting! - Family Court Reports". Archived from the original on 2007-09-29. Retrieved 2007-08-22.
- ↑ Diebolt, Dan. "Straight Up". YouTube. Retrieved 2007-08-04.
- ↑ Pederson, Robert. "Equal Parenting Bike Trek Part 1". Studio 1714. Retrieved 2007-09-05.
- ↑ Pederson, Robert. "Equal Parenting Bike Trek Part 2". Studio 1714. Retrieved 2007-09-10.
- ↑ Pederson, Robert. "cycling4children.com". Robert Pederson. Archived from the original on 2007-08-28. Retrieved 2007-09-10.
- ↑ "Glenn Sacks". Glenn Sacks. Retrieved 2021-12-28.
- ↑ "F4J UK Storms the Lincoln Memorial Aug-17-07(1)". YouTube. 2007-08-18. Retrieved 2021-12-28.
- ↑ "2007 DC Rally". Archived from the original on 2023-03-29. Retrieved 2024-07-08.
- ↑ Part I, Part II, "Michigan's 36th District Court - Willie G. Lipscomb, Jr". Archived from the original on 2007-09-29. Retrieved 2007-08-20.
- ↑ Tim McKyer
- ↑ Part I, Part II,
- ↑ Carol Rhodes video
- ↑ "Carol Rhodes Former FOC Enforcement Officer". youtube.com. Retrieved 2007-09-18.
- ↑ Carol Rhodes Barry County
- ↑ Jay Fedewa
- ↑ Larry Holland
- ↑ "Nationwide Blueprint". Archived from the original on 2007-06-14. Retrieved 2007-06-08.
- ↑ Glen Steil
- ↑ Rick Jones
- ↑ Fulton Sheen
- ↑ Robert Pedersen
- ↑ Charalambous, Mark (October 2006). "Bar Wars gets ugly" (PDF). The Fatherhood Coalition. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-07-07. Retrieved 2007-05-07.
- ↑ Johnson, Barb (2007-01-10). "Barb's Revised Appeal of the Judgment of Dismissal". FalseAllegations.Com. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-05-16.
- ↑ Murtari, John. "Federal Civil Rights Action For Parents". Retrieved 2007-08-05.
- ↑ "New York Times Press Gives Major Press Coverage for Fathers". Fathers & Families. 2005-05-08. Archived from the original on 2007-08-28. Retrieved 2007-05-27. and for failing to capture the human side of the fathers' rights movement.
- ↑ "Dr. Ned Holstein Critiques PBS Film "Kids & Divorce: For Better or Worse"". Fathers & Families. 2006-09-15. Archived from the original on 2007-08-28. Retrieved 2007-05-27.